To: LowNslow
The actual source appears to have been from Pakistani Intelligence. So, why would a Paki intelligence guy give the name to the NYT? The answer is because that would be the fastest way for a double dealing Paki to notify al Qaeda that they hade a mole.
19 posted on
08/08/2004 9:57:17 AM PDT by
fso301
To: fso301
The actual source appears to have been from Pakistani Intelligence. So, why would a Paki intelligence guy give the name to the NYT? The answer is because that would be the fastest way for a double dealing Paki to notify al Qaeda that they hade a mole.BINGO!!
24 posted on
08/08/2004 10:07:58 AM PDT by
Mister Baredog
((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
To: fso301; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Eva; MeekOneGOP; PhilDragoo; Travis McGee; ASA Vet
"The actual source appears to have been from Pakistani Intelligence. So, why would a Paki intelligence guy give the name to the NYT? The answer is because that would be the fastest way for a double dealing Paki to notify al Qaeda that they hade a mole."
Yep, and the world wide impact that the NY Slimes has would enable Islamo NY Slime watchers to realize that a double agent was working against them.
So the the NY Slimes release of the name and locality was a massive freebie flash warning to Islamofascists around the world.
This same technique was used by the communists working for the Washington Post and NY Slimes during the Carter years when CIA agents were being outed. One or both of these reprehensible papers would publish the name of an agent and where he was assigned like as a sec state employee in our Embassy in Athens. The exposed agent and his family members had to flee the country they were in or be captured or killed.
40 posted on
08/08/2004 12:12:19 PM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(Franchurian Dork Candidate, le Jacquestrap Kerri says, "Judge me by my record".. We will!!.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson