Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The gun-law sky is falling?
Star-Telegram ^ | August 8, 2004 | J.R. Labbe

Posted on 08/08/2004 5:53:44 AM PDT by MikeJ75

Chicken Little arrives every four years in a feather-ruffled flurry squawking about some kind of impending doom. This year she is incited to a level of hen-ish hysteria by the encroaching expiration of the federal "assault weapons" ban.

Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry is all for extending the ban on 19 military-style firearms, coos Chicken Little. He suspended his campaign back in March so he could go to Washington and cast one of the few Senate votes he found time to make in the past year. No one should read anything political into that.

But that bad ol' President Bush, clucks the harried hen, he said he'd sign an extension of the ban, but he isn't doing anything to force those nasty, gun-loving, NRA-co-opted Republicans to bring it to a vote.

Chickie needs to pipe down and revisit what the president did say about the ban, adopted by Congress and signed by President Clinton in 1994. Bush said he'd sign the extension if it made it to his desk. He never promised to pressure lawmakers into getting it to that point.

This is just one more example of how hysteria and ignorance can warp understanding of an issue.

The uninformed make audacious claims: "If the ban expires, it will become legal to buy dangerous, rapid-fire guns most commonly seen in action movies."

First, all firearms are dangerous, which is why it is so important to teach children never to think they are toys. But this line from a Statesman Journal editorial, which ran last month in the Salem, Ore., newspaper, equates the firearms covered by the ban with machine guns.

Even if the ban is lifted, John Q. Schnutz still will not be able to purchase fully automatic machine guns, which are highly regulated.

"A tidal wave of assault weapons will soon legally flood the country unless Congress acts quickly to renew expiring federal legislation," screamed the editorial page of Utah's Deseret Sun last month. "Just what we don't need -- more opportunities for deadlier weapons to fall into the hands of criminals -- and more 'play toys' to attract our children's attention."

Gracious. Dilute that rhetoric with some facts, and you find that the guns banned under the Federal Violent Crime Control Act of 1994 are no deadlier than my .22-250 deer rifle.

Chickadees, let's take a breath and do some fact-checking on what the "assault weapons" ban did and did not do.

The 1994 crime bill forbade the manufacture and import of certain guns that Congress defined as "assault weapons."

These firearms were classified by how they looked and not by how they operate. Cosmetic and ergonomic features like telescoping stocks, bayonet lugs, pistol grips and flash suppressors that give the firearms a military-style appearance were banned even though they are mechanically indistinguishable from traditional sporting rifles.

The provision that banned "high-capacity" ammunition magazines is also scheduled to expire Sept. 13, although the House bill calling for the ban's extension does not mention high-capacity magazines.

The ban did not outlaw ownership of semi-automatic guns. Banned "assault weapons" have always been available on the secondary market, and owners of those guns don't break any law by reselling them.

The fact that you don't have to wear body armor and take your kids to school behind a bulletproof shield proves that the preponderance of America's gun owners are responsible, law-abiding people with no interest in committing crime.

Calling these guns the "weapons of choice for criminals" and "weapons whose only purpose is to kill people" reveals deliberate denial of reality. A National Institute of Justice study released in 1999 -- gee, who was president then? -- said exactly the opposite. "Assault weapons" were rarely used to commit murder in this country.

As to the emotion-laden "kill people" assertion: Shooting enthusiasts use military-style firearms to "kill" nothing more than pieces of paper or metal targets. Easy to operate, reliable and accurate, they make sport and competitive shooting fun.

Of course, the anti-gunners cite those same characteristics as something purely evil.

It is interesting to note that Kerry is not as vocal as his more enthusiastic supporters on this issue.

Rural voters in those all-important swing states of Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania own guns. Some of them view extending the ban as a step toward more restrictive gun laws that might next target that trusty ol' deer rifle -- which operates exactly like those dreaded "assault weapons."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: bang; bangbang; banglist; guns; nra

1 posted on 08/08/2004 5:53:44 AM PDT by MikeJ75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bang_list

Bang.....BANGBANGBANGBANGBANGBANG


2 posted on 08/08/2004 6:07:07 AM PDT by heckler (wiskey for my men, beer for my horses, rifles for sister sarah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bang_list

Bang.....BANGBANGBANGBANGBANGBANG


3 posted on 08/08/2004 6:08:26 AM PDT by heckler (wiskey for my men, beer for my horses, rifles for sister sarah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MikeJ75

The writer of this article, J R Labbe, is a woman who truly understands the entire "gun Issue". I have such great respect for her, and am always pleased when I see something new she has written.


4 posted on 08/08/2004 6:20:59 AM PDT by basil (CantheBan.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heckler

Oops, I see you left out one BANG. :-)


5 posted on 08/08/2004 6:25:15 AM PDT by PistolPaknMama (www.cantheban.net --Can the "assault" weapons ban!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: heckler

You can't access the bang list by typing it into the address heading anymore. It has to be written like this, "Bang list" as a key word.

The author mentioned gun control only appeared every four years. I wish. When the Republicans didn't have control over Congress, gun control was introduced every couple of months.

Sunsetting the AWB is just a start. If we get rid of the dem party, we can start rolling back some of the federal laws.


7 posted on 08/08/2004 6:30:40 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems.ss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MikeJ75
assault weapon

Assault is an action, not a device.

8 posted on 08/08/2004 7:32:38 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5

Thanks for the info Shooter.


9 posted on 08/08/2004 7:34:09 AM PDT by heckler (wiskey for my men, beer for my horses, rifles for sister sarah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MikeJ75
"It is interesting to note that Kerry is not as vocal as his more enthusiastic supporters on this issue."

Timing is everything. Kerry is stupid, but I think he's smart enough to set the spark without a strobe. The lesson Gore learned in 2000 was not lost on him. I look for a Republican sweep in November anyway. But even so, I'm afraid the compassionate, magnanimous ones in the party will give the store to the democrats as a consolation prize again. Look for some form of weapons ban legislation to pop up during the first quarter.

10 posted on 08/08/2004 8:27:37 AM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5

It has to be written like this, "Bang list" as a key word.



No space. Although "bang" alone will lead to many articles.


11 posted on 08/08/2004 8:33:11 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MikeJ75

12 posted on 08/08/2004 8:38:55 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
"Sunsetting the AWB is just a start. If we get rid of the dem party, we can start rolling back some of the federal laws."

T'would be nice, but it'll never happen. They need each other to blame for attaching bad laws at the end of a Bill.

'I didn't have time to read the whole Bill. Geez, it was 20,000 pages long!

13 posted on 08/08/2004 8:54:22 AM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MikeJ75
John Kerry is all for extending the ban on 19 military-style firearms,

Kerry Feinstein Kennedy Schumer et al are pushing a bill to ban all handguns...all clip or detachable magazine fed semi auto and pump rifles and shotguns regardless of caliber.

Kerry has his picture taken in rural areas with 'shotgun toting' country folks (and consequently lies about his deer hunting experiences)...Kerry is always photographed with and over under or single shot shotgun...

Interestingly enough..this is the only type of weapon Kerry says we "peasants" should be allowed to own...

Where we will be allowed to keep them and what we must do in order to qualify for gun ownership are the even darker secrets those who hate America and Americans wont let out until the moment of truth......

If John Kerry is elected and dems get control of the legislatures and the courts....I have no doubt that breaking into homes (with no probable cause) or warrant-less searches.. seizure of property...and secret courts and prisons will follow.

The Third Way- Fourth Reich are at our doorstep...and it's most interesting that the Democratic Candidate of choice for POTUS resembles the mythological 'Frankenstein'....

The Dems could not have a more perfect symbol of exactly 'what it is' they bring to the party...

imo

14 posted on 08/08/2004 9:04:59 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound

Let's get rid of the dems first and then you can tell me it doesn't help.


15 posted on 08/08/2004 2:32:57 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems.ss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5

Well, I agree, of course. IMO, the country will never be restored as long as there is even one socialist perp holding elective office. Even then, it will take another 10 years to ferret out the rinos.


16 posted on 08/08/2004 2:46:26 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson