Posted on 08/07/2004 10:31:36 PM PDT by TBP
I'm proudly supporting Jim. I'm sure some Scottish Law Specter apologists will rant and rave about how I'm such a wacko "purist" who opposes any candidate who doesn't agree with me on "100%" of the issues, which is really funny considering I am backing EVERY candidate for the U.S. Senate who was NOT my "original choice" in the primary (Keyes, Isakson, DeMint, McCain....even Murkowski if I have to, ugh) The only EXCEPTION is Specter because the PA race has given us two reliable DEMOCRATS running against each other, only one has "R" next to his name on the ballot.
If you want to see real "purists" who are hoping a great conservative will lose to a socialist because THEIR candidate wasn't selected after the primary, check out all the Keyes bashers on the Illinois threads.
The PA race simply gives conservatives no other choice but to vote third party. If I agreed with Specter's platform, I'd be a registered RAT (like the Oklahoma RAT U.S. Senate candidate who has the SAME "Conservative" rating as Specter).
Uh-oh...he's a REAL CONSERVATIVE PATRIOT...better hurry up and CRUCIFY him...lol
Who's 'we' tried to elect Toomey and failed? The GOP didn't even support Toomey but rather that miserable letch AINO Sprectum...
B-U-M-P!!!!
But Specter said he'd work hard to be a better Republican and represent the values of the people of Philadelphia...er, I mean, Pennsylvania.
Unfortunate about the Constitution Party candidate's name.
I hope there is an alternative besides a Rat here in the AZ senate race. The wife & I under no circumstances can vote for McCain again.
We will not pass, we want him to lose and will vote for a Rat if there is no other. We like our enemies upfront and out in the open, I will be letting the McCainiac know we are voting against him.
He has come to believe he is an irremovable institution, hope to prove him wrong and send a message to all the other RINOS across the nation, "Your BS rat appeasing happy days are over" and hard times are acoming.
If you are sincere supporter of his, you would follow Toomey's advice.
Hoeffel would be a junior Senator if elected. Specter would chair the Senate Judiciary committee, where he will block every single conservtaive judicial nominee. The only point that Specter supporters can make is that Leahy or U-Boat Commander Kennedy will chair the judiciary committee if the Dhimmis take the Senate (admitedly a possibility). And the difference between Specter and Leahy (or Kennedy) would be? Do those advocating Specter really think Limp-Wrist Frist will pass him over for the judiciary chair if elected?
However, running candidates for the legislature is exactly what the CP needs to be doing, even if the US Senate is a pretty big leap at this stage. We have a de-facto Dhimmicrat Senate now thanks to RINOs like Specter, Collins, Snowe, Chaffee, Hatch and McCain. Specter is an enemy every bit as much as Leahy is. He should be put out to pasture to enjoy his fat Senate pension.
I have to agree with you. Specter is a RINO. I held my nose last time and voted for him. I won't this time. George Bush can win PA but he really needs to ignore the big cities and concentrate on the more rural areas but of course the people that run the campaign don't understand this. He needs to make an I-80 tour from west to East or the other way around. He can hit small towns north and south of I-80 and the people would love it. The rural areas are pretty much Republican but their votes are taken for granted and I am afraid that will backfire this year. People are fed up with the loss of good paying factory jobs. (I don't necessarily see this as the gov't's fault but I lot of people do) John Kerry being president honestly scares the living crap out of me!
He sounds like a man I'd be proud to vote for.
Never experienced that, living in New England.
Go Clymer.
Santorum, go to confession and say 10,000 Hail Marys for your sin.
bump
I guess we'll see if Bush's calculation was an accurate one. But make no mistake - the situation was a predictable one, yet Bush made his decision nonetheless.
The day after Specter won the nomination, he was on TV, spouting his "independence". I cannot, in good conscience, support him again. I did, once before, hold my nose and pull that lever, but I'm not doing it this time. I think it will be easier to vote Hoeffel out in 2010.
The ONLY reason Arlen won the nomination is because of the president's support of him. I was sad to see Santorum support him.
Go Clymer Go!
I don't think Bush figured on the conservative distaste for Arlen. I really believe if Bush had known Arlen would only beat Toomey by 2 percentage points, he never would have given that RINO such vocal support.
Toomey told a good friend of mine he almost choked on the words. He has to be a good soldier if he wants the nomination for the governor's race. Don't kid yourself, Pat Toomey'll be pulling the lever for Clymer.
I know that some people would prefer to nurse grudges and stoke resentments, rather than put aside their honest disagreements and work for the president's reelection, but I just don't think that doing so is in our best interests.
I was just as pissed off as anyone else when I heard about the razor thin margin that allowed Specter to squeak through with the Republican nomination, but that doesn't mean that I'm going to hold that against President Bush this November.
Whether or not you think that his endorsement of Arlen Specter was a tactically wise choice-and I agree that ultimately that one decision may come back to haunt the Bush campaign-I think that the primary focus should be on ensuring George W. Bush's reelection.
As much respect as I have for Pat Toomy, I do think that we have an obligation to assist him-along with many other genuine conservatives living in the state of Pennsylvania-with his efforts to support President Bush during this campaign season.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.