[Puddleglum]

Loftus blamed the 'white house' for leaking to the New York Times. Now I ask you, how likely is that scenario.

The Times has not sense, no shame, and no excuse in publishing this info. I am stunned to think of the a__hole editor who greenlighted this. Did they do it to feed the 24-hour news cycle and sell papers or to undermine national security? I cannot fathom a paper having done this during WW II. It is unforgivable.

[OldFriend]

We don't know if any of the 'story' is true. It could be nothing more than an attempt to divert attention from the seriousness of the terror threat.

There is no depth to which the media wouldn't sink.

[johnb838]

The Times may have toed the line during the war, but my understanding is they were pulling much the same sh!t in the post-war reconstruction years. They've always been a communist house organ.