Skip to comments.
Unmasking of Qaeda Mole a U.S. Security Blunder-Experts
Reuters ^
| Auguat 7, 2004
| Peter Graff
Posted on 08/07/2004 12:07:47 PM PDT by be-baw
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 last
To: Numbers Guy
I read elsewhere that the name was given "off the record" so someone broke the trust. It's also a display of national differences; in UK people seem to be happy trucking along assuming the gov't is in control, over here people want to know the detail so they can make their own decisions. It's a very tricky game to play for the administration.
It would be helpful if every self-styled expert and publicity hound politician would just shut up but that's too much to hope for I guess.
81
posted on
08/09/2004 10:17:59 AM PDT
by
1066AD
To: be-baw
Was this info classified? I guess it doesn't really matter since we don't prosecute people for breaking the espionage laws anymore.
82
posted on
08/09/2004 10:43:41 AM PDT
by
ampat
To: ampat
"said it was leaked from the White House to the NYT" Question: When Bush went to Bagdad, did he take ANY NYT reporters with him?
Answer: NO
This joker lied - the Bush WHITE house doesn't TRUST the NYT and doesn't communicate with it except when forced to@!
To: be-baw
There are some people somewhere who need to learn to keep their dang mouths shut.
84
posted on
08/09/2004 6:50:34 PM PDT
by
TruthNtegrity
(We must all work hard to insure Pres. Bush's re-election by a landslide!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson