Skip to comments.
Kerry's Goal of Independence From Middle East Oil Divides Advisers
NY Times ^
| 8/7/04
| Neela Banerjee
Posted on 08/06/2004 10:44:42 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: NormsRevenge
I thought Kerry's idea of two yugos in every garage was brilliant
To: NormsRevenge
I don't think we could ever totally free ourselves of the need for foreign oil, but we certainly could, and should reduce our dependence on it. Bio-diesel is one place to start.
3
posted on
08/06/2004 10:48:48 PM PDT
by
Keith in Iowa
(Michael Moore has made "documentary" a 1-word oxymoron.)
To: NormsRevenge
improving fuel efficiency is an underrated concept, but what the saudi ambassador said is right(for a change)... every candidate since nixon has made this promise... and nobody has ever even worked toward making it a reality.
4
posted on
08/06/2004 10:49:28 PM PDT
by
Betaille
("Show them no mercy, for none shall be shown to you")
To: Always Right
Will Theresa and Hillary teach everyone how to fly brooms?
5
posted on
08/06/2004 10:50:02 PM PDT
by
GSlob
To: Always Right
Everyone just wants a four cylinder Toyota Prius, right?
The quickest way to stop our dependence on foreign oil is to drill more. The Dumborats won't let us.
Furthermore, it is highly unlikely that we can turn off the spigots from the Middle East, where we get approximately 20% of our oil now. We don't have enough oil to fulfill our own domestic needs. There is only so much oil we can take from Mexico, Canada, and Venuzuela to make up the difference.
Surely Kerry wouldn't want to have energy prices increase because he's too stubborn to get oil from the Middle East, or is he?
To: NormsRevenge
If we are serious about oil independence we need to open up some public lands for exploration, and cut back on some of the ridiculous environmental laws That make fuel more expensive.
To: Keith in Iowa
I don't think we could ever totally free ourselves of the need for foreign oil... Agreed...but a Baghdad to Boston pipeline, and a "Free Gasoline day" on the anniversity of Saddam's capture, would go a long way in alleviating some of our dependence.
8
posted on
08/06/2004 10:55:33 PM PDT
by
JPJones
To: NormsRevenge
" if you can't control demand, you will never have an energy policy." "The government shouldn't try to suppress citizen's demands, it should instead facilitate increasing supply to meet those demands.
It's the difference between an expanding economy and a contracting one.
9
posted on
08/06/2004 10:56:21 PM PDT
by
bayourod
(I resent Kerry telling me that his values, not mine are the only true American values.)
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
Surely Kerry wouldn't want to have energy prices increase because he's too stubborn to get oil from the Middle East, or is he? Don't kid yourself. Kerry's message is simply posturing. If he were elected, he would deal with OPEC just like everyone else.
To: the_Watchman
Don't kid yourself. Kerry's message is simply posturing. If he were elected, he would deal with OPEC just like everyone else. Wait? Kerry lies? I am shocked. I thought only Bush lies. /sarcasm
To: NormsRevenge
Same old ideas from same old stupid Democrats.
Here are the real solutions:
1) Drill...everywhere-screw the envirowackos.
2) Build 100 new nuclear plants, two per state.
3) Encourage and build the infrastructure for more usage of natural gas.
4) Quit taxing consumption of gasoline at such high levels since almost all states have huge surpluses in their transportation departments and most of them are so corrupt they'd make Al Capone blush.
5) Give up on solar, wind and other ridiculous power supplies. We've wasted billions of dollars over decades and haven't gotten one inch better in the technology while the increases in technology for coal, oil, nuclear, etc. have been monumental. But as is typical for idiot liberals, they hang on to discredited and proven false ideals while pooh-poohing new ideas.
6) Quit wasting billions on farm subsidies for ethanol. If anyone is willing to do the research they'll find the use of mixed fuel ethanol decreases engine efficiency to the point more usage increases the need to burn the oil part of the formula. Thus, the more you use ethanol the more oil based gasoline you use to get the same results. My father proved this years ago when he was a GM mechanical engineer. Of course, they may have improved the formula but I doubt it.
7) Simply tell the public, at no cost, that if they just keep their oil changed, tires at full pressure, the air filter clean, the fuel injectors clean, etc. they could realize many more miles per gallon. Simple preventative maintenance. But then again, the average American is too stupid to do any preventative maintenance of their own bodies and wait until something goes wrong and incur higher healthcare costs.
It's not rocket science.
12
posted on
08/06/2004 11:00:43 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(I voted FOR John Kerry...before I voted against him!)
To: NormsRevenge
"said one expert from the oil sector who advises the campaign and who, like other advisers, spoke on condition of anonymity."Any guesses who this person is?
13
posted on
08/06/2004 11:01:08 PM PDT
by
endthematrix
(Go balloons. Go balloons. Go balloons, balloons?)
To: NormsRevenge
...some of whom contended that the country had not had a comprehensive energy policy since President Jimmy Carter.
Ah...
To: endthematrix
probably not a Halliburton fella, I reckun ;-)
15
posted on
08/06/2004 11:06:53 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... "The terrorists will be defeated, there can be no other option" - Colin Powell)
To: Always Right
"reads more like notes from a brainstorming session than a detailed blueprint for economic and social change. The ideas are diverse and often vague, in an effort to have as many people as possible sign on." And those continuous flip-flops.
As for the Yugo.....
Make that a Trabank to go
Why do Trabank's have heated rear windows? ...to keep your hands warm when pushing.
How do you double the value of a Trabank?....Fill it up with petrol
16
posted on
08/06/2004 11:07:18 PM PDT
by
spokeshave
(strategery + schadenfreude = stratenschadenfreudery)
To: NormsRevenge
This is nonsense on stilts. Only a small portion (something like 17%) of oil we import comes from Saudi Arabia. Most of our imported oil comes from Mexico and Canada.
To: Fledermaus
I agree 90% you are on the right track! Not so hot on the nuke plants. Would like to see something popular come out of corn byproducts. I'm from IL (the tyranny state) and we have coal and corn. Both good fuel. He have ComEd nuclear power too, but still pricey and way too many accident reports for my comfort.
18
posted on
08/06/2004 11:12:09 PM PDT
by
endthematrix
(Go balloons. Go balloons. Go balloons, balloons?)
To: NormsRevenge
Who knows, really? Strange bedfellows - the rich and politically connected are.
19
posted on
08/06/2004 11:13:39 PM PDT
by
endthematrix
(Go balloons. Go balloons. Go balloons, balloons?)
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
Dennis Miller said it right tonight. When they make an electric or hybrid that looks like a Boxter, I'll buy one.
20
posted on
08/06/2004 11:15:18 PM PDT
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson