Replies

VOTE BUSH IF YOU WANT AMERICA TO WIN THE WAR ON TERROR.

Vote Kerry if you want a UN-led fight that is more 'sensitive' to our enemies and if you think the terror threat is 'exagerrated'. Yes, Kerry really said that. He'll say anything in front of an audience, but can he really *do* what it takes, like Bush has done? NO!

People's blindness and giving in to liberal media bias is maddening. We scored a huge victory against Al Qaeda, grabbing several big fish and unrolling a few networks this past month. HUGE POSITIVE MOMENTUM. The information was getting back to Al Qaeda anyway, since we were making other arrests and they were in the news. 2/3rds of top Al Qaeda is gone now ... this story that publicizing what we know is irrelevent at best, and likely false. Why? This man was in custody and our enemies after some time knew it.
We are kicking butt big-time against Al Qaeda and the best the media can do is to keep finding problems to carp about, whether true or false, while ignoring the reality of the threat and appreciating the seriousness of our response. Their BIAS IS SICKENING.

A VOTE FOR ANYONE BUT BUSH is a VOTE FOR KERRY
AND A VOTE FOR KERRY IS A VOTE FOR DEFEATISM AND INDECISION IN THE WAR ON TERROR. Kerry has made it clear: He's a say-anything do-nothing senator who is WRONG to fight this war.

BUSH IS RIGHT FOR OUR TIMES.

Ask your friends this: Given Kerry's votes for cutbacks to intelligence and votes against practically every useful defense system in the past 20 years, Given Kerry big-spending and high-taxes liberalism,
Given Kerry's waffling on Iraq and other issues, his vote against Gulf War I ... WOULD YOU HAVE WANTED KERRY PRESIDENT ON SEPTEMBER 11TH?

Tell your friends to wake up and get educated.
This is BS: "they believe a government split with a Dem pres and Rep house will spend less money," ... time and again, it's the Democrats demanding more money, as Pres Clinton did it, in the Congress, they do it too. Fact is: A Conservative Majority will spend less money and be better for America. VOTE FOR CONSERVATIVES AND REPUBLICANS ALL THE WAY DOWN THE BALLOT!

hehe, that was actually a wrong post meant for someone else, but if you wanna compare spending under Bush, vs. Clinton with a Rep congress here's some good info...

http://www.cato.org/current/federalspending/index.html

Most are acrobat files so I won't link directly... My conclusion in this is either Presidents spend less in their second terms, or a split government is best for less spending. -The gridlock reasons of course.