[okie01]

The Times published a story Monday saying U.S. officials had disclosed that a man arrested in Pakistan was the source of the bulk of information leading to the security alerts. The Times identified him as Khan, although it did not say how it had learned his name.

"Anonymous intelligence officials", no doubt.

Yet another damaging leak. Meant to damage...who?

Let's hope that Fitzgerald's grand jury is addressing this kind of activity.

[WOSG]

The New York Times has done their best to damage the Bush administration.

Things like intelligence capability, and national security are considered 'collateral damage' in the virtuous struggle to defeat the Bush administration.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

The Times identified him as Khan, although it did not say how it had learned his name.

I have this unproven theory that we got to Khan from our side, starting with the Navy reservists which lead to the guy in London (Babar Ahmad ) who was a cousin of Khan, had the 2001 Naval ship movements, was a recruiter, supported the operations in Chechyan in several ways and communicated regularly with Khan..... etc.!