Advertising your inability to comprehend a system that can be described on one page does merely reinforces your general reputation here as an economic incompetent.
From what I can decipher, this paradigm-shifting giberrish turns the true, natural free market topsy-turvy, upside-down, inside-out and bass-ackwards by imposing a bureacraticly fabricated artificial "free market" to run roughshod over the one that evolves more naturally.
Please describe how the proposed system is fabricated or bureaucratically imposed. It will be interesting seeing as you are the big fan of big buck socialist infrastructure, including transportation systems, water delivery, and electrical generation.
I, and every other man, women and child on this planet, have a God-given inalienable right to the freely breathe the air that surrounds us WITHOUT any financial/economic system granting us permission to do so. To suggest that such a right is a transferrable, marketable commodity that can be bought/sold/traded by government authorized artificial corporate entities acting as risk assessing certification agents is absolutely ludicrous. Fabricating an artificial, complex system of bureacratic legal documents and contracts so our natural resources can be "managed" by a bunch of money-grubbing Enron-style daytraders is the epitome of idiocy.
A true free market is efficient.
And efficiency abhors the artificial complexity you seek to impose to harness market forces.
Your proposal is hooey, but I congratulate you on your success as an author.
There are many "free market" fanatics who are so mesmerized by the mantra that they'll buy into any convoluted proposal that satiates their addiction to market jargon. You do have a very unique twist on this fad, so I hope you sell enough books to maintain a respectable standard of living. But like the authors who specialize in investigating BigFoot, the Loch Ness monster, crop circles, etc. etc., I don't take your proposal seriously. Sorry.