Skip to comments.
Why We're Winning
City Journal ^
| Autumn 2003
| Brian C. Anderson
Posted on 08/06/2004 12:52:46 PM PDT by andyandval
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
For depressed Freepers, this should cheer you up.
To: andyandval
2
posted on
08/06/2004 12:58:33 PM PDT
by
exzoomie
To: andyandval
nice, welcome to freerepublic.
3
posted on
08/06/2004 12:59:58 PM PDT
by
Zavien Doombringer
(I must be the source of Gravity, everything seems to come down on me)
To: qam1
For some strange reason, I thought of you when I read this... < /olive branch >
:-)
Back to my regularly scheduled troll patrol...
4
posted on
08/06/2004 1:04:53 PM PDT
by
L,TOWM
(From the "Party of Jefferson" to the "Party of Shmeagle" in less than 200 years...)
To: andyandval
Fox enjoys especially high numbers among advertiser-coveted 25- to 54-year-old viewers, and it is attracting even younger news junkies. As one CNN producer admits, Fox is ?more in touch with the younger age group, not just the 25?54 demo, but probably the 18-year-olds.? Even more attractive to advertisers, Fox viewers watch 20 to 25 minutes before clicking away; CNN watchers stay only ten minutes. Fox?s typical viewer also makes more money on average?nearly $60,000 a year?than those of its main cable rivals.
5
posted on
08/06/2004 1:05:33 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: Paleo Conservative
To: MeekOneGOP
7
posted on
08/06/2004 1:09:19 PM PDT
by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
To: andyandval
Many conservatives have attacked South Park for its exuberant vulgarity, calling it "twisted," "vile trash," a "threat to our youth." Such denunciations are misguided. Conservative critics should pay closer attention to what South Park so irreverently jeers at and mocks. As the show's co-creator, 32-year-old Matt Stone, sums it up: "I hate conservatives, but I really f@$^&*g hate liberals."
8
posted on
08/06/2004 1:10:37 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: Paleo Conservative
Killer quote. glad you liked the article.
To: qam1; ItsOurTimeNow; PresbyRev; tortoise; Fraulein; StoneColdGOP; Clemenza; malakhi; m18436572; ...
Xer Ping Ping list for the discussion of the politics and social aspects that directly effects Gen-Reagan/Generation-X (Those born from 1965-1981) including all the spending previous generations (i.e. The Baby Boomers) are doing that Gen-X and Y will end up paying for.
Freep mail me to be added or dropped. See my home page for details and previous articles.
10
posted on
08/06/2004 1:26:31 PM PDT
by
qam1
(Tommy Thompson is a Fat-tubby, Fascist)
To: L,TOWM
Thank you for the Ping
</Olive branch extended right back to you>
11
posted on
08/06/2004 1:27:58 PM PDT
by
qam1
(Tommy Thompson is a Fat-tubby, Fascist)
To: andyandval
To: andyandval
I asked mods to add publish date to your thread. It is especially important to include that when the article is not new.
To: NutCrackerBoy
Duly noted,forgive a newbie freeper.
To: andyandval
It's kind of refreshing, but until something is done about the entrenched leftism in the universities, I won't get my hopes up.
15
posted on
08/06/2004 1:51:36 PM PDT
by
cinnathepoet
(Directly, I am going to Caesar's funeral)
To: cinnathepoet
Wait until they get to deal with my kids and the 1.3 million (and growing) of their compatriots in another few years. The mold brains won't know what hit 'em.
16
posted on
08/06/2004 2:03:28 PM PDT
by
L,TOWM
(From the "Party of Jefferson" to the "Party of Shmeagle" in less than 200 years...)
To: andyandval
Well done! btt for research bank.
17
posted on
08/06/2004 2:04:14 PM PDT
by
Fenris6
To: L,TOWM
Yes. That's true. We have the demographic advantage. The liberals aren't producing many kids of their own and that might pay off in the near future in universities.
18
posted on
08/06/2004 2:09:28 PM PDT
by
cinnathepoet
(Directly, I am going to Caesar's funeral)
To: cinnathepoet
I forgot to mention that my kids and the 1.3 million compatriots I referred to are HOME SCHOOLED. They will make an impact disproportianate to their numbers, but, yes, conservative christian famillies pretty much "choose life".
19
posted on
08/06/2004 2:24:50 PM PDT
by
L,TOWM
(From the "Party of Jefferson" to the "Party of Shmeagle" in less than 200 years...)
To: andyandval; John Lenin
It's safe to say that the blogosphere cost Raines his job. When the story broke about Times reporter and Raines favorite Jayson Blair's outrageous fabrications in the paper's pages, Sullivan, Kaus, Drudge, blogger-reporter Seth Mnookin, and other web writers kept it alive, creating pressure for other media, including television, to cover it. When disgruntled Times staffers began to leak damning information about Raines's high-handed management style to Jim Romenesko's influential media-news site Poynter, the end was near. Kausfiles's "Howell Raines-O-Meter," gauging the probability of the editor's downfall, was up barely a day or two when Raines stepped down. "The outcome would have been different without the Internet," Kaus rightly says. The Times's new ombudsman acknowledged the point: "We're not happy that blogs became the forum for our dirty linen, but somebody had to wash it and it got washed."
Yeah they cleaned out all their dirty Lenin!
20
posted on
08/06/2004 2:38:43 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson