Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: texaslil
The first thing one learns in Pol.Sci. 101 is "you have to win." It's one of the sadder things I learned. It doesn't matter how great a leader might be, if he doesn't WIN, he can do nothing, not to mention he becomes chopped liver.

The problem with your idea is that is has a very short term focus. Would there ever have been a President Reagan if not for Goldwater? Maybe not.

Sticking to your principles sometimes make sense; but you may not be able to be determine what the long term consequences of doing so will be.

Leadership does not always mean winning.

68 posted on 08/06/2004 9:26:58 AM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: independentmind

think you may have missed the point. If Bush doesn't win, he can't lead, or not lead. the entire point is moot. If you're talking about long term strategy, it might be better if he lost. After four years of Kerry, Hitlery might not have the chance of a snowball in Hell. On the other hand, who knows the future? Sorry to always be quoting books, but "Of Mice and Men" comes to mind.


76 posted on 08/06/2004 9:37:30 AM PDT by texaslil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson