So, if I understand this correctly, John Kerry is the only person to have server honorably in Viet Nam?
Everybody else that server is a Bush goon.
I need to study more. I just can't catch on to this liberal cognitive dissonance thing..
Part of the problem
may be assuming that
traitorous, liberal, power grubbing, Marxist, globalist idiots
HAVE
cognitions
instead of electrical shorts along the synapses of their slug neurons.
That is the thing about Kerry's position: He admitted to atrocities in Viet Nam, in from of the Senate committe in '71 - but everyone else is to blame but John Kerry. The only way to not have your manhood questioned by John Kerry is to be wuss enough to support his position that he is the only American war hero. Period. Not just in Vietnam.Kerry never accords anyone else respect for valor equal to his own, and never accords anyone else any respect at all unless they are liberals. Whether or not you have a bunch of comrades testifying against his specific claims you have to understand that actual heroes respect the valor of others too much to brag. Kerry respects the valor of others not at all, and FWIW my opinion of his description of his own valor is that he protests too much. Far, far too much.
He can boast as he will about how he will keep us unmanly people safe, but the real question of a Democratic candidate has to be, "Where are you going to find a qualified Secretary of Defense who is willing to work for you?" Because there hasn't been a good Democratic SecDef in half a century, all the way back to the Truman Administration. Even if you think Cohen was OK, he was a Republican. Les Aspin accepted responsibility for Black Hawk Down and resigned.