Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry/Edwards lawyers warn TV stations over Swift Boat ad
Rush ^ | August 5, 2004 | unknown

Posted on 08/05/2004 12:01:48 PM PDT by mcg1969

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 741-759 next last
To: mcg1969

Democrats believe in free speech for porn peddlers.


When it comes to political speech, they believe in censorship.


441 posted on 08/05/2004 1:38:22 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks

see post 405


442 posted on 08/05/2004 1:39:05 PM PDT by keysguy (Trust the media as far as you can throw them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative

Did any of the vets on Hannity seem concerned? Are they totally legit? why is their technology guy on the radio instead of fixing their site?


443 posted on 08/05/2004 1:40:09 PM PDT by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: weegee
...Kerry Scampaign...

That's a good term for it - hadn't heard that one before.

444 posted on 08/05/2004 1:40:26 PM PDT by ride the whirlwind ("I will never relent in bringing justice to our enemies..." - President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly
I thought the ads were selected small market buys. This threat of a lawsuit almost assures national news coverage, which even is better than buying a national ad. :o)

Remember the Willie Horton ad from 1988? The Bush campaign ran it one time. Thats it. It ran once as a paid advertisement. After that, the dems went bonkers and it was played over and over and over on every channel.

And never mind that it was Algore that brought up Willie Horton first in the RAT primary.

445 posted on 08/05/2004 1:40:31 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: keysguy

Hey, no worries. Just figured you were sorta new, and I'd be nice rather than just jump on you and pummel you ;0)


446 posted on 08/05/2004 1:40:52 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (Liberals - The Other White Meat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies]

To: kjam22

AMEN!!!


447 posted on 08/05/2004 1:41:20 PM PDT by cubreporter (-I trust Rush...he will prevail in spite of the naysayers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

"They didn't seem to mind Farhenheit 911."


That brings up an interesting thought--why didn't "WE" scream foul and threaten to sue for all the lies in the movie? I realize if it had been promoted as fiction there might have been a problem, but wasn't it promoted as a documentary and therefore subject to a stronger set of rules and standards?


448 posted on 08/05/2004 1:41:41 PM PDT by mupcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: traumer

I don't have the software either.


449 posted on 08/05/2004 1:42:02 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (They are where you least expect. Look around and you'll see them too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
The letter also says that the doctor in the ad claiming he treated Kerry is lying and didn't treat Kerry.

It should be pretty easy for Kerry to show he is lying if that is the case. Produce your medical records that document who treated you Kerry!

450 posted on 08/05/2004 1:42:40 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
Hannity just offered the services of Mark Levin if the swift vets need him, landmark legal foundation.
451 posted on 08/05/2004 1:43:10 PM PDT by keysguy (Trust the media as far as you can throw them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

What;s with President on the plane? Hes NOT President he's a candidate for the Presidency.


452 posted on 08/05/2004 1:43:34 PM PDT by cubreporter (-I trust Rush...he will prevail in spite of the naysayers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: mcg1969

OK, so what about the claim on the fax that says none of the guys saying those nasty things about Kerry even served on either of the two boats (PCF 44 & whatever) he was on? That's a good question. How does one explain that?


453 posted on 08/05/2004 1:43:42 PM PDT by Max7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: Liz

The revolution will not be bloodless!


454 posted on 08/05/2004 1:44:05 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (They are where you least expect. Look around and you'll see them too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Is this unprecedented?

Well, there was the time that Harry Truman threatened to punch out a Washington Post critic who panned his daughter's piano concert.

455 posted on 08/05/2004 1:44:39 PM PDT by snopercod (What we have lost will not be returned to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks

AMEN!


456 posted on 08/05/2004 1:44:56 PM PDT by cubreporter (-I trust Rush...he will prevail in spite of the naysayers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: ArcLight
FWIW, here's a link to an article that suggests that legal efforts against the ad are doomed to failure. An excerpt:

Laws protecting consumers from false advertising of products are enforced pretty vigorously. For example, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) took action in 2002 to protect the public from the self-proclaimed psychic "Miss Cleo," whom the FTC said promised free readings over the phone and then socked her gullible clients with enormous telephone charges. The FTC even forced a toy company a while back to stop running ads showing its "Bouncin' Kid Ballerina Kid" doll standing alone and twirling gracefully without human assistance, which the FTC said was video hokum.

But there's no such truth-in-advertising law governing federal candidates. They can legally lie about almost anything they want. In fact, the Federal Comunications Act even requires broadcasters who run candidate ads to show them uncensored, even if the broadcasters believe their content to be offensive or false.

And of course, if the ad is true, case closed.

457 posted on 08/05/2004 1:44:58 PM PDT by ArcLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: GretchenM

Email of support and gratitude sent.
I view this as "Fargin War" and a threat beyond the WOT.
Thanks for the link.

mc


458 posted on 08/05/2004 1:45:14 PM PDT by mcshot ("When you don't think too good, don't think too much" Ted Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: SpinyNorman
They are trying to intimidate the radio stations.

Where's Susan Sarandon's wife, Tim Robbins, and his complaining about the "chill wind blowing across this land"?

459 posted on 08/05/2004 1:45:18 PM PDT by My2Cents (http://www.conservativesforbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: mcg1969

BRING IT ON!


460 posted on 08/05/2004 1:45:22 PM PDT by GVnana (Tagline? I don't need no steenkin' tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 741-759 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson