Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stocks Fall as Oil Prices Hit a New High ($44.40)
Reuters ^ | August 5, 2004 | Michael Flaherty

Posted on 08/05/2004 10:26:03 AM PDT by RWR8189

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. stocks tumbled on Thursday after oil prices hit record highs for the fifth consecutive trading session, jumping above $44 a barrel amid renewed supply concerns.

The oil price jump came after July sales from U.S. retailers largely met modest expectations but failed to excite most investors. Shares of Wal-Mart (WMT.N: Quote, Profile, Research) fell, dragging down the Dow, as the world's largest retailer said July sales were not fueled by its namesake discount stores.

Trading remained light before Friday's release of U.S. employment data for July. Economists polled by Reuters expect nonfarm payrolls -- a key measure of the economy's strength -- to rise by 228,000 jobs after June's modest gain of 112,000.

The Dow Jones industrial average was down 96.23 points, or 0.95 percent, at 10,030.42. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index was down 11.48 points, or 1.04 percent, at 1,086.89. The technology-laced Nasdaq Composite Index was down 22.59 points, or 1.22 percent, at 1,835.52.

"Oil is the number one concern. Number two, it's summer and it's quiet, and that's when stocks tend to drift," said Bill Punk, managing partner at Punk Ziegel & Company.

Earlier, the Labor Department said the number of people filing for initial U.S. jobless aid fell 11,000 to 336,000 in the week ended July 31 as the pace of layoffs slowed and the job market brightened.

U.S. blue-chip stocks posted slim gains on Wednesday as oil futures fell from a 21-year high to $42.83 a barrel amid easing concerns about global supplies.

But on Thursday oil prices bounced back, with NYMEX crude futures hitting another 21-year record at $44.40 a barrel on concerns Russian oil company Yukos would be unable to export, reviving worries about supply disruptions.

Shares of clothing retailer Gap Inc. (GPS.N: Quote, Profile, Research) fell after the company posted sales below expectations and slashed its profit forecast. Its shares dropped $1.34 to $20.04.

Wal-Mart's stock fell 81 cents to $52.39. The company said July sales were largely in line with expectations, but most of the strength came from its Sam's Club warehouse stores and not the namesake discount stores, which account for the bulk of Wal-Mart's sales and profits.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: 50dollaroil; brent; crude; crudeoil; nymex; oil; oilshock; petroleum; shock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 08/05/2004 10:26:08 AM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
his pu**y president of ours needs to get tough with this jerking around by the Saudis.
2 posted on 08/05/2004 10:30:05 AM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

His is This I am poed about this crap.


3 posted on 08/05/2004 10:34:08 AM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

America should begin oil drilling in Alaska and come up with alternative forms of energy so we won't have to depend on OPEC.


4 posted on 08/05/2004 10:37:57 AM PDT by SmithPatterson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boomop1

China and Indian markets expanding.

Supply-side sabotage of Iraqi oil transport.

And, yes, us. The light truck exemption application to SUVs. Are oil use has increased much the last three years.


5 posted on 08/05/2004 10:41:38 AM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Free Iran already!


6 posted on 08/05/2004 10:44:20 AM PDT by Smile-n-Win (When dealing with tyrants, a "peaceful solution" must only be considered as the very last resort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smile-n-Win; All
Free Iran already!

Coming January 2005...take THAT to the bank!!!

7 posted on 08/05/2004 10:58:48 AM PDT by Lael (Patent Law...not a single Supreme Court Justice is qualified to take the PTO Bar Exam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Read the following article from the Associated Press printed in the local paper on July 30.

HIGHER OIL PRICES BOOST EXXON MOBIL, SHELL PROFITS

DALLAS--Exxon Mobil corp., the world's largest publicly traded oil company, posted record profits of $5.79 billion Thursday, and the Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Cos. saw its earnings rise 54 percent thanks to higher prices for oil and natural gas.

The sterling earnings reports which came on top of strong results from BP and Conoco Phillips may be small comfort to motorists paying about $2 for a gallon regular unleaded--unless they also happen to be shareholders.

Exxon Mobil, for instance, earned a profit of more than $10 on each barrel of oil it produced, said Pat Mulva, the company's director of investor relations.

Mark Baxter, director of an energy institute at Southern Methodist University, said pump prices should be even higher, given that crude is hovering near $43 a barrel.

"These profits probably appear gross, and consumers wonder why they're not lowering the prices," Baxter said. "They could do that, but the first time they did, the CEO would get fired."

Baxter said oil companies need to make profits while the getting is good to carry them through times of low prices and to take risks to explore around the world.


8 posted on 08/05/2004 10:59:48 AM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
"his pu**y president of ours needs to get tough with this jerking around by the Saudis."

Yes sir!

All 20% of our oil comes from the Saudis ... let's petition GWB to nuke them!

9 posted on 08/05/2004 11:04:40 AM PDT by G.Mason (A war mongering, red white and blue, military industrial complex, Al Qaeda incinerating American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason

Got to start some where, they are the chief instigators.


10 posted on 08/05/2004 11:11:05 AM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Gosh. If only America really did do the 'blood for oil' that we got accused of anyways we wouldn't have these high oil prices. It's a lose-lose. If we're going to get accused of stealing the oil anyways, let's take some!


11 posted on 08/05/2004 11:12:30 AM PDT by SerialRants (http://www.serialrants.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson; Isara
America should begin oil drilling in Alaska
Better yet -- we need to elect John Kerry and saddle ourselves with large new excise taxes on gasoline, y'know, for our own good. Maybe even have Al Gore as Energy Secretary. Here's something from last year: The headline is 95 per cent spin:
Moderate Republicans Try to Block ANWR Bill
by John Heilprin
February 11, 2003
"It would seriously undermine the legislative process to add new provisions behind closed doors and at the very last minute to a must-pass spending bill that is already four months late," the eight GOP lawmakers said in a letter to House Appropriations Committee Chairman Bill Young, R-Fla... The Senate Republicans, led by their appropriations committee chairman, Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska, succeeded Monday night in protecting provisions that would open more areas in Alaska and national forests throughout the West to new logging... Stevens also is pushing for language in the bill to provide money for "pre-drilling" in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve... Opening ANWR to drilling for oil and natural gas is the centerpiece of President Bush's energy policy... The letter was signed by House Science Committee Chairman Sherwood Boehlert of New York, Reps. Mike Castle of Delaware, Christopher Shays of Connecticut, Jim Leach of Iowa, Nancy Johnson of Connecticut, Wayne Gilchrest of Maryland, Chris Smith of New Jersey and Sue Kelly of New York.
Kerry Blasts Bush Environmental Policies
Reuters
February 11, 2003
Kerry said in a speech at the John F. Kennedy presidential library in Boston that the United States must reduce its dependence on foreign oil so it cannot be held hostage by leaders like President Saddam Hussein of Iraq... Kerry, one of six declared Democratic candidates who plan to seek their party's nomination to challenge Bush in the 2004 presidential election, said the United States cannot drill its way to self-sufficiency along the lines favored by Bush in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Instead, he urged development of technology to make homes, businesses, and transportation more efficient while creating a national market for biofuels from crops, wood, and waste.
Oil And Trouble (ANWR)
Posted on 03/20/2004 7:52:02 AM PST by Isara
Even though opening ANWR would mean a 20% increase in domestic production, the green groups say that contribution won't address the country's energy needs; they look at the predicted decline in domestic oil production and can say that ANWR will replace only what will be lost... If ANWR had already been tapped, it would be providing enough oil to today's market that those gasoline prices that have climbed so painfully high would still be within a more reasonable range. As for replacing what will be lost in the inevitable fall in domestic production, that speaks for itself. If we don't replace it with Alaskan oil, it will have to come from another country. We import about 55% of our oil now, but if ANWR isn't opened to development, the EIA says that ratio will hit 70% by 2025.
Do the opponents of drilling a small part of the ANWR think the energy crunch is going to improve with age? Even Carl Levin of Michigan wanted it.
George W. Bush will be reelected by a margin of at least ten per cent

12 posted on 08/05/2004 11:21:17 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: boomop1

And the Russians. And all the oil dictators who don't want a democratic Iraq.


13 posted on 08/05/2004 11:26:50 AM PDT by rushmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: boomop1

Lighten up Francis.


14 posted on 08/05/2004 11:30:21 AM PDT by biblewonk (WELL I SPEAK LOUD, AND I CARRY A BIGGER STICK...AND I USE IT TOO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

1602pm edt

Dow 9,963.03 -163.48 (-1.61%)
Nasdaq 1,821.63 -33.43 (-1.80%)
S&P 500 1,080.72 -17.91 (-1.63%)

Will the market break 9000 before the GOP convention?


15 posted on 08/05/2004 1:04:58 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
This recent spike can be chalked up to the Russians.
16 posted on 08/05/2004 1:09:40 PM PDT by bikepacker67 (Sandy wasn't stuffing his socks, he was stuffing A sock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic

Anythings possible with this irrational market. That is a huge drop compared to 2 hrs ago. Given that this market has shrugged off every bit of good news so far this year as meaningless (yet rallied last year on much weaker news), one wonders why it hasn't gone down much further.


17 posted on 08/05/2004 1:12:02 PM PDT by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67
Well shoot we already whipped their ass, boycott vodka.
18 posted on 08/05/2004 1:22:14 PM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
it's the "Big Oil Traders / Speculators" that are setting the all time high oil prices NOT OPEC(i'd like to know how much OPEC gets for selling it compared to the price it's TRADED at) and i'd like to know how much money $oro$ has dumped into oil trying to manipulate the oil price going into the elections
19 posted on 08/05/2004 1:24:15 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Yo Doc!

Give me a hand here-- everyone's saying that equity prices are being controlled by the oil market.  For a few hours this actually seemed true, until noon today.  Oil prices jumped to a record high while and equities sat still for a couple hours.   At the end of the day equities tanked with nothing spectacular happening with oil. 

Maybe for a few hours we had traders come in who were here last Tuesday when stocks and oil both went up-- or maybe Reuters is grasping at straws to make themselves sound impressive.

Your take?

 


20 posted on 08/05/2004 1:28:39 PM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson