Skip to comments.
Iraq Survey Chief Duelfer: Saddam Was Developing Nukes
Newsmax
Posted on 08/05/2004 9:49:10 AM PDT by bubman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: bubman; StriperSniper; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; ...
Saddam Hussein had an active nuclear weapons development program at the time of the U.S. invasion in March 2003, chief U.S. weapons inspector Charles Duelfer has told Congress.PING!!!!!!!!!!
To: snooker
As I've been told by more than one lady: tryin' ain't gettin'.
22
posted on
08/05/2004 10:15:28 AM PDT
by
lugsoul
(Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
To: Turbo Pig
Does this mean that the Dem talking heads are lining up to move the goal-posts, again? Now really. They hadn't even begun underground testing yet. How could we possibly consider this a threat?
Getting real again: Whatever happened to that story that Saddam had shipped a bunch of nuclear engineers to Libya and that was where the real work was going on?
To: OXENinFLA
still waiting on those test from oak ridge of the stuff from Al Tuaitha - to see if it matches up with the Libya material.
To: lugsoul
Developing is on the way to getting.
You put your oil for food money down ... step up to the bazaar, or send Libya to stand in for you.
25
posted on
08/05/2004 10:20:59 AM PDT
by
snooker
To: barryallen; bubman
i wont believe it till saddam drops a nuke right in downtown, and even then it better have his name on it And then (no matter when ) you'd blame Bush. Type in "laser isotope separation" and Iraq into google sometime and see what the Clinton administration was allowing them to develop. It is a technique that would let them refine uranium far better than the centrifuge method that libs so gleefully dismissed as being phony.
26
posted on
08/05/2004 10:21:38 AM PDT
by
techcor
To: Oldeconomybuyer
To: bubman
I'm sure that the reason why President Bush isn't apologizing for the absence of WMD is that President Bush still isn't convinced that there wasn't WMD, and I've heard him say as much in interviews. But what he needs to do is to tell the American people, "It's possible that there were no WMD in Iraq but we haven't finished our investigations. Rather than rushing into a statement that may have to be corrected later, I'm withholding my final judgement until the investigation is done.'
To: barryallen
To: Izzy Dunne
To: snooker
Good point. The dems know that they can't play the WMD card anymore...since WMDs were found.
After the Sarin and Mustard find...they changed their rhetoric to......."Well....its not a big stock pile".
So let me see if I get the democraps straight.
They are so big on quotas...that there has to be a certain bench mark quota of dead people for it to matter?!
To: bubman
This article has been posted to DoctorZins New News Blog!
32
posted on
08/05/2004 11:28:36 AM PDT
by
DoctorZIn
(Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
To: bubman; Carl/NewsMax
33
posted on
08/05/2004 12:03:11 PM PDT
by
adam_az
(Call your State Republican Party office and VOLUNTEER!!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson