[horatio]

When you have to lie and mislead, the cause can't be that righteous.

If he's so proud of his stance, let him say it openly.

It's true that many businesses have similar names, but to choose a business name with the intent of causing confusion (or if a reasonable person might be confused) is not legal.

If any of the allegations are true, from either dispensing phony medical device (telling a woman that "performed too early, (an abortion) could be harmful to her health") to outright lying about the services the company offered ("pretending to refer women to abortion providers at bargain prices, then telling them their appointments had been postponed" in order for the women to miss the legal window for abortion), he ought to be shut down.

Right does not need to lie. If you need to lie to make your point, your point is wrong.

[azcap]

When you have to lie and mislead, the cause can't be that righteous.

Is that what you would say to Schindler, or the family who hid Anne Franke? Would you tell that to the station masters on the underground railroad? Liberals are free to criticize this man from any angle, but pro-lifers who criticize him need to remember that there are two objectives to pro-life activities. One is to politicaly end legalized infanticide in America. This man did nothing to help change the abortion laws of Louisiana. But the 2nd goal (and the point of it all really) is to stop a child (or 30 million) from being murdered. He may very well have saved a human life.

[LonghornFreeper]

>>When you have to lie and mislead, the cause can't be that righteous.
If he's so proud of his stance, let him say it openly.

So when the Gestapo came in and asked where the Jews were, Christians and others who hid them should have just told them the exact location? After all, no need to lie, since their cause was just.