All I know is what is at the bottom of that article I linked linked...Scott had printed out the info at a later date but the date on the site showed Dec 5th..a fact Geragos has emphasizd..Obviously Wall could tell about the date not being updated on the site itself...Scott looked at it first on the 7th if I recall correctly, printed it out even later.
I was just recalling that in that other case (whose name shall not be mentioned), they could tell when the file was downloaded in addition to when the file was dated (on the website). I thought that was standard?