Like I said, we do not have to be fair to evil. Illinois belongs to God, not to Obama and evil 'rats, so there is nothing immoral for aman of God by invitation to accept hte offer and move there under these circumstances.
I am appealing to a greater good ethic/hierarchicalism: Since when does a candidate like Obama (who apparently would not even support a state version of the born infants alive act) have more of a right to serve in the Senate (even in Illinois) than a man who believes in God's word? Obama does NOT have more of a right.
Using God as the standard Alan Keyes has more of a right to represent Illinois than Obama does.
When the people of the Lincoln State vote him in, that's when.
This isn't The Exorcist OK, and quit insulting my intelligence with that dribble. We either have principles, or we do not.
You go on and justify acting in a manner that you consider unprincipled in others however you want to justify it, but all you have done is act exactly the same as the person that you're calling "evil"...which makes you equally evil.
Old adages have survived the test of time for a reason, that reason usually being that they are right.
Two wrongs do not make a right.
Vote for God! :)