Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flights of Fancy [Private jet hypocrites]
The New Republic on line ^ | August 2, 2004 | by Gregg Easterbrook

Posted on 08/02/2004 8:37:15 PM PDT by aculeus

In Washington the hand-wringing continues about the various security breakdowns that, on the day before Ronald Reagan's funeral, caused the Capitol to be evacuated when the approach of a private plane bearing Kentucky Governor Ernie Fletcher was mistaken for a terrorist attack. Surely it is unsettling that after three years of security improvements at almost unlimited expense, confusion reigned regarding who was responsible as Fletcher's plane droned toward the center of D.C. and was briefly believed to be doing just what the 9/11 attackers had done. But set the anti-terrorism snafus aside and ask the question that has so far gone unasked: Why did the governor of Kentucky need to travel in a taxpayer-funded private plane?

An unreported scandal is the extent to which contemporary politicians increasingly zoom around in taxpayer-funded private planes, having an entire aircraft to themselves at an expense that is pure government waste, rather than simply flying aboard commercial airliners. For years it's been hard to get statistics on exactly how many politicians are riding their own special planes. But since September 11, any "general aviation" (non-commercial, non-military) aircraft wishing to land at Washington's Reagan National Airport has required a special waiver to do so. At a hearing last month, the Aviation Subcommittee of the House Transportation Committee reported that since September 11 restrictions were imposed, 244 waivers have been granted to politicians arriving at Washington in personal aircraft. And this is just politicians: It doesn't count the number of cabinet secretaries and Defense Department officials who zoom around in federal-government supplied individual jets that operate from Andrews Air Force Base near Washington, rather than simply flying commercial.

(Excerpt) Read more at tnr.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: easterbrook; generalaviation
Laurie David, wife of Larry David--among Hollywood's wealth elite owing to "Seinfeld" royalties--has become an influential environmental crusader, but herself travels in chartered Gulfstream jets.
1 posted on 08/02/2004 8:37:16 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Anyone NOT a cabinet secretary should be flying commercial. This would both improve security and improve the performance of the TSA knowing they might be wanding someone who can actually get them fired.


2 posted on 08/02/2004 10:11:01 PM PDT by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
I once worked for John Deere and enjoyed the company's jet fleet while shuttling from Madison, Wisconsin to Des Moines, IA and Moline IL. On one circuit from Des Moines back to Madison I was the only passenger on a Citation III. 

I fancied myself starring in an "I can make YOU a Millionaire in No Money Down Real Estate!" infomercial, stepping off my private jet and into a waiting Bentley.

For about 3 microseconds.

3 posted on 08/02/2004 10:24:38 PM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Anyone NOT a cabinet secretary should be flying commercial.

Nonsense. Put them all on commercial flights, including cabinet tax-suckers. They don't own us.

4 posted on 08/02/2004 10:26:52 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Refuse to allow anyone who could only get a government job tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

I live near a very minor and partialy shot down Army base. I heard Lear Jet traffic into and out of the airfield on base waaaay too often to be reasonable and justified. The whole Homelame Security thing has degenerated into a massive gravy train for government poltroons.


5 posted on 08/02/2004 10:33:08 PM PDT by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: eno_

Shut down, that is.


6 posted on 08/02/2004 10:34:23 PM PDT by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: eno_
The whole Homelame Security thing has degenerated into a massive gravy train for government poltroons.

There's a shock, huh? And it's never going away and they're never going to get off our backs and out of our wallets.

At least, not until American Revolution 2.0.

7 posted on 08/02/2004 10:35:31 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Refuse to allow anyone who could only get a government job tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken
I once worked for John Deere

Ooooh, I've seen their Gulfstream at KOTM up close. Coool.

8 posted on 08/02/2004 10:40:44 PM PDT by Big Giant Head ( < Roast Chicken?!?>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: eno_

But...but...they're supposed to be making us safer and more secure from terrorism! I'm SHOCKED, SHOCKED, I tell you!

And if you didn't catch any sarcasm there, you should consider voting Nader.


9 posted on 08/03/2004 12:04:59 AM PDT by LibertarianInExile (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson