Yes, I will dismiss it out of hand because I've seen the full argument and witnessed how it works, why it works and looked at the data. Strata dating and carbon dating have proven to be largely a joke and that is what made me doubt the traditional story, even with the full rundown which actually involves a circular argument. So, I looked for an alternate solution that had fewer problems or none and no circular arguments and found it. So, yes, I dismiss the traditional approach out of hand. I'm full aware of the arguments against a global flood. There used to be only one "We will not even consider it, shut up".
Please enlighten us, then. Or do you expect us to believe you just on your say-so.
This really is a classic crevo thread. The evo side puts up links to scientific journals, universities, libraries etc. The creos say "Nope. Don't buy it. God did it. End of discussion."
They say "there are no transitionals." You show them a whole bunch of transitionals. They move the goalposts: "Show me a bird-fish!"
They say "no benefical mutations." You show them the A-1 Milano mutation, the super-strength mutation etc. They say "where are the gliding, gill-breathing humans!"
The only silver-lining is that Havoc strikes me as somebody who will, sooner or later, go over the edge and get banned,