For a theory that is yet unproven to produce laws based on assumption which you then inject here as a matter of dispute is begging the question. Where did you learn logic - or did you ever? Because what you just did is beg your argument to support your argument and that violates the first law of logic.
As I see the word "theory" used quite a bit by Havoc, some reference material on theories, opinions, etc.
See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1037248/posts?page=70#70
where Havoc writes:
"Note: a theory is still an opinion."
to which a response comes:
"Incorrect. A theory is "An entire body of knowledge associated with a particular area of study, including the basic postulates, predictions based on these postulates, observations and experimental data, and their interpretation. [Cal Poly Physics Colloquium, 9/23/99]. Theories are well described, repeatedly observed, and verified statements. When they have repeatedly confirmed over a long period of time, the theory for all practical purposes is used as true or fact, (sometime referred to as superb theory such as quantum mechanics).
Theory does not imply uncertainty or opinion - not in science."
Which is why Rome abrogated responsibility to science with regard to homosexuality so that it could blame someone else, presumably for the impact of pedophiles in her pulpits around the world (not just here in the united states as some would have us believe). I'm sure they appreciate your assistance, as a Roman Catholic, in defending science. Tomorrow, if it suits their purposes, they'll roast you alive for Gallileo's sake. Really, Rome does need to learn the difference between science and quackery. Imprison Gallileo and let the homos run rampant and destroy kids. Can I count on you to expound on your remarks and give them more "credibility". LOL
BTW, Fury starts many of his posts "Havoc writes:" because he was put on a leash by the mods on request because of his behavior elsewhere. Just so everyone's aware.