Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Havoc
No, I think it's clear in the discussion what has been talked about.

Yes, it is quite clear. You said in 112 that there are no transitional fossils. I gave one. You haven't made any serious attempt to dispute that Archaeopteryx is transitional.

Show the fish growing legs, arms and lungs, etc.

I have a reptile with wings and feathers. I can give you a fish - amphibian transitional if you want, but let's have the verdict on my reptile-bird transitional first. Why isn't it a transitional?

264 posted on 08/03/2004 2:26:12 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor (Raffiniert ist der Herrgott, aber boshaft ist Er nicht.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]


To: Right Wing Professor

Transitional placemarker.


265 posted on 08/03/2004 2:27:28 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies ]

To: Right Wing Professor
Yes, it is quite clear. You said in 112 that there are no transitional fossils. I gave one. You haven't made any serious attempt to dispute that Archaeopteryx is transitional.

Does it show a partial change from a reptile toward being a bird or is it a bird with what you think are reptile characteristics. A fully developed critter ain't a transition. Sorry. I know you want to confuse the two things and point to this as transitional; but, it ain't transitional. I believe this is a repetition at this point.

294 posted on 08/03/2004 4:11:29 PM PDT by Havoc (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson