[Havoc]

Oh good grief. It's no longer a dog because it's fur is black and brown now instead of just black. Call the papers. We got evolution going on here - not. You guys really do beg credulity don't you.

[Modernman]

Oh good grief. It's no longer a dog because it's fur is black and brown now instead of just black. Call the papers. We got evolution going on here - not. You guys really do beg credulity don't you.

If, in the future, these whales were no longer able to mate with other killer whales, would that be enough for you?

How do you define different species?

[Dimensio]

Modernman, you've forgotten the fundamental rule of arguing evolution with a creationist: the creationist gets to define all of the terms. Whatever a creationist tells you is the way it is. If a creationist's definition of "evolution" differs from the one that you and every rational scientist on the planet uses, the creationist is in the right. When a creationist speaks of "no transitionals", they're referring to that which they define as transitionals. By definition, anything that does exist or has existed is not a transitional, therefore they are right.