If we could scientifically prove the existence of God, he wouldn't be God, now would he?
Given the millions of animals on the face of the planet, surely you would be able to find one living animal group that is observably in transition.
Everthing alive on the planet today could be a transitional species. Problem is, we don't know exactly what they might be transitioning into, since we can't see into the future. However, some marine biologists think that Atlantic and Pacific Killer Whales are transitioning into different species. Similarly, the King Cheetah may be an evolving form of Cheetah.
Why not? The angels were right there with him according to scripture and saw him face to face - dealt with him eternally. Mankind once walked with him directly. Why would proving his existance disprove who He is?
Everthing alive on the planet today could be a transitional species. Problem is, we don't know exactly what they might be transitioning into, since we can't see into the future. However, some marine biologists think that Atlantic and Pacific Killer Whales are transitioning into different species. Similarly, the King Cheetah may be an evolving form of Cheetah
One of you says every species is in transition. You say they all "could be" Which is it. And sorry, a cheetah transitioning to a cheetah isn't anything but a cheetah. Do they really sit and think these things up. How about if I put a rubics cube on the table and tell you it's a rubics cube transitioning into a rubics cube. I'd give me meds. Nobody is really much interested in what scientists "THINK" is happening. Last year peanuts gave you cancer, today they're recommended for a good diet (not really; but, you get the picture). If we filled a book with what science has thought and been wrong on, this planet couldn't contain it.
And what they think is rather directly begging the question isn't it. I mean this whole conversation is about what they think. And the theory has largely been rewritten out of necessity in order to dodge difficult questions. Time is the miracle here, followed by the slight of hand of replacing theory with theory each time a particular version don't quite work out. Believe me, we understand. But it seems science expected everyone to not notice what they've been up to. lol. oh well.
Why not? The angels were right there with him according to scripture and saw him face to face - dealt with him eternally. Mankind once walked with him directly. Why would proving his existance disprove who He is?
Everthing alive on the planet today could be a transitional species. Problem is, we don't know exactly what they might be transitioning into, since we can't see into the future. However, some marine biologists think that Atlantic and Pacific Killer Whales are transitioning into different species. Similarly, the King Cheetah may be an evolving form of Cheetah
One of you says every species is in transition. You say they all "could be" Which is it. And sorry, a cheetah transitioning to a cheetah isn't anything but a cheetah. Do they really sit and think these things up. How about if I put a rubics cube on the table and tell you it's a rubics cube transitioning into a rubics cube. I'd give me meds. Nobody is really much interested in what scientists "THINK" is happening. Last year peanuts gave you cancer, today they're recommended for a good diet (not really; but, you get the picture). If we filled a book with what science has thought and been wrong on, this planet couldn't contain it.
And what they think is rather directly begging the question isn't it. I mean this whole conversation is about what they think. And the theory has largely been rewritten out of necessity in order to dodge difficult questions. Time is the miracle here, followed by the slight of hand of replacing theory with theory each time a particular version don't quite work out. Believe me, we understand. But it seems science expected everyone to not notice what they've been up to. lol. oh well.