Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: balrog666; Junior; Lurking Libertarian

Thanks for the ping. Pure creationist thread, so I won't ping the evo list. However, it's tagged "crevolist" for the archives. If things should heat up and require the ping list, let me know. Otherwise, I think this thread probably belongs on the religion forum.


12 posted on 08/02/2004 4:28:52 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Since 28 Oct 1999, #26,303, over 193 threads posted, and somehow never suspended.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry
Of late your comments bring me a strange joy in reading.

Otherwise, I think this thread probably belongs on the religion forum.

There is a quite confidence to this line, which brings on a slow smile.

43 posted on 08/02/2004 5:54:20 PM PDT by bondserv (Alignment is critical!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Worthy of noting this suberterfuge:

"Even when the great philosopher of science Karl Popper suggested that the standard version of evolution even falls short of being a scientific theory, being instead an untestable tautology, he was subjected to public condemnations and much personal abuse."

.... in which the author conspicuously fails to inform his readers that Popper subsequently reversed himself after realizing he was in error. His first opinion about natural selection was based upon what others had told him, not upon his own analysis. Popper's final opinion, which is the only one that counts, was that it DID meet the test of being scientific.

But we mustn't let facts stand in the way of a good anti-Evolution screed.

;-)

48 posted on 08/02/2004 6:35:29 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson