Thanks for the ping. Pure creationist thread, so I won't ping the evo list. However, it's tagged "crevolist" for the archives. If things should heat up and require the ping list, let me know. Otherwise, I think this thread probably belongs on the religion forum.
Otherwise, I think this thread probably belongs on the religion forum.
There is a quite confidence to this line, which brings on a slow smile.
"Even when the great philosopher of science Karl Popper suggested that the standard version of evolution even falls short of being a scientific theory, being instead an untestable tautology, he was subjected to public condemnations and much personal abuse."
.... in which the author conspicuously fails to inform his readers that Popper subsequently reversed himself after realizing he was in error. His first opinion about natural selection was based upon what others had told him, not upon his own analysis. Popper's final opinion, which is the only one that counts, was that it DID meet the test of being scientific.
But we mustn't let facts stand in the way of a good anti-Evolution screed.
;-)