Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Renfield
The author fails to mention mutation, either from ignorance of malice. Either way, the author is not stating evolutionary theory correctly. I predict that no Creationist will criticize this author for such a failure.

But the boundaries between species are distinct and firm-...

The author neither defines "species" nor gives evidence for such a claim.

107 posted on 08/03/2004 8:41:35 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Doctor Stochastic
But the boundaries between species are distinct and firm-...

The author neither defines "species" nor gives evidence for such a claim.

And a good thing too! Just in the area of North American birds, of which there are less than a thousand species, I can recall at least ten major disputes about speciation. It used to be thought that Baltimore orioles and Bullock's orioles are the same species. Molecular biology now shows they're not even closest relatives. The common towhee was one species, and now is two. The slate colored Junco was several species, and now is one. Ditto the yellow rumped warbler. The crossbill may actually be a complex of at least nine almost indistinguishable but reproductively isolated species.

Nobody with the slightest practical experience of biology would make such an idiotic statement as the one you quoted.

135 posted on 08/03/2004 10:25:18 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson