Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michigan Supreme Court strikes down 1981 Poletown decision (emminent domain abuse)
Mlive.com ^ | July 31, 2004 | David Eggert

Posted on 08/02/2004 10:41:26 AM PDT by tdadams

DETROIT -- The Michigan Supreme Court on Friday redefined the power of Michigan governments to take property for development projects, overruling a landmark 1981 decision and barring Wayne County from acquiring land for a 1,300-acre project near Detroit Metropolitan Airport.

On the court’s final day of its term, all seven justices agreed that the earlier precedent should be overturned, though they differed on the reasons and whether the decision should be applied retroactively.

Justice Robert Young, who wrote the lead opinion, called the 1981 case allowing Detroit’s Poletown neighborhood to be cleared for a General Motors Corp. plant a “radical departure from fundamental constitutional principles.”

“We overrule Poletown,” Young wrote, “in order to vindicate our Constitution, protect the people’s property rights and preserve the legitimacy of the judicial branch as the expositor, not creator, of fundamental law.”

Young said the case presented a clash between two fundamental legal principles: individuals’ right to control their private property and government’s authority to condemn property for public use.

The court heard arguments in April about an effort by Wayne County to acquire land for a planned 1,300-acre industrial and commercial project near Detroit Metropolitan Airport. The case drew the attention of Michigan communities as well as advocacy groups from across the country.

The county in 2001 sued landowners who refused to sell property for its Pinnacle Aeropark project in Romulus and Huron Township. Lower courts sided with the county, which argued that it had the right to buy the remaining land -- about 2 percent of the project site -- under Michigan law and the Poletown precedent.

But the defendants argued that the 1981 Poletown case was flawed. They said the state constitution limits governments to use eminent domain in instances where the land will have a public use.

“This is a towering decision by a very bright court,” attorney Alan Ackerman, who represents the landowners, said Friday of the Supreme Court’s ruling. “The day of unlimited governmental power to acquire property may be over.”

The ruling is retroactive, applying to all pending cases where there's a challenge to the Poletown decision.

Some justices dissented from that part of the decision, arguing that it should apply prospectively.

Justices Michael Cavanagh and Marilyn Kelly said Wayne County, which spent $50 million on the project, shouldn't be "penalized" for following the court's earlier precedent.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: emminentdomain; forfeiture; land; property; publicproperty; seizure
This is an incredible and long overdue reaffirmation of the rights of property owners. It is also stunning these days to see a court acknowledge in a written opinion that courts have been, but ought not, to write law from the bench. What a decisive victory for constitutional integrity.
1 posted on 08/02/2004 10:41:30 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tdadams
Say, speaking of property rights, has anyone heard of a Michigan decision that limits the public from using "navigable" waterways? Thanks in advance.
bttt
2 posted on 08/02/2004 10:44:49 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdadams

Lets hope that other courts around the country take notice and follow this ruling.
There's something abhorrent for a court or city to say that they can take your propoerty and give it to someone they "like" better, ie, usually the one who will make them more money.


3 posted on 08/02/2004 10:50:23 AM PDT by Adder (Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
ED is such a sledgehammer tool that I have always thought that a doubling or tripling of compensation in simple development projects should be a minimum.

Better to just get rid of the development taking.

4 posted on 08/02/2004 10:53:24 AM PDT by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdadams

Wow, nice to see this.

patent


5 posted on 08/02/2004 10:54:31 AM PDT by patent (A baby is God's opinion that life should go on. Carl Sandburg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdadams

Posted a day or so here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1182086/posts


6 posted on 08/02/2004 10:57:43 AM PDT by flashbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdadams

I bet this won't be applied against the NYT, which did the same thing in NYC.


7 posted on 08/02/2004 11:38:11 AM PDT by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson