This article is so full of holes in both logic and science that it hardly merits comments. This guy should pick up a Biochemistry text that was written in the 20th century.
Howdy! I realize you think this article doesn't merit comments, but I would appreciate it if you could point out a few of the holes. Thanks.
Go ahead. I have Master's in Biochemistry and 22 years in my profession too: I hold individual BS degrees in biology and chemistry, as well, and like the author my name is also on synthetic patents.
He doesn't happen to accept evolutionary premises and their inherent impossibilites as fact, like you do. I don't accept them either.
Instead of just blowing smoke and posturing, why don't you challenge and refute statements he has made on a scientific instead of an emotional basis.