Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael_Michaelangelo

This article is so full of holes in both logic and science that it hardly merits comments. This guy should pick up a Biochemistry text that was written in the 20th century.


44 posted on 08/02/2004 10:49:36 AM PDT by SCChemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SCChemist
This article is so full of holes in both logic and science that it hardly merits comments.

Howdy! I realize you think this article doesn't merit comments, but I would appreciate it if you could point out a few of the holes. Thanks.

46 posted on 08/02/2004 12:22:50 PM PDT by Michael_Michaelangelo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: SCChemist; Michael_Michaelangelo
This article is so full of holes in both logic and science that it hardly merits comments. This guy should pick up a Biochemistry text that was written in the 20th century.

Go ahead. I have Master's in Biochemistry and 22 years in my profession too: I hold individual BS degrees in biology and chemistry, as well, and like the author my name is also on synthetic patents.

He doesn't happen to accept evolutionary premises and their inherent impossibilites as fact, like you do. I don't accept them either.

Instead of just blowing smoke and posturing, why don't you challenge and refute statements he has made on a scientific instead of an emotional basis.

70 posted on 08/02/2004 2:17:01 PM PDT by Agamemnon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson