Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schwarzenegger Sells Off $18 Million Complex
Reuters on Yahoo ^ | 8/1/04 | Reuters -Los Angeles

Posted on 08/01/2004 12:28:51 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (news - web sites) and his wife, Maria Shriver, have sold three properties in their posh Pacific Palisades residential compound, which is valued at about $18 million, and a fourth parcel is in escrow, the Los Angeles Times reported on Sunday.

The couple has not lived on the 5.3-acre property since they bought a new home in nearby Brentwood for about $11.9 million in 2002, the paper reported.

The four parcels in the compound were offered as three separate homes. Matthew Maxwell Taylor Kennedy, a son of Robert F. Kennedy and a cousin of Shriver, bought one of them: a $3.4 million home with a pool and tennis court that sits on one acre of land. Schwarzenegger purchased that home for Shriver in 2001 as a Valentine's Day (news - web sites) gift.

Two other homes in the compound were sold as one estate with a sale price believed to be $7.95 million, the paper reported.

On Saturday, a year after California went through a tumultuous gubernatorial recall election brought on by state financial woes, Schwarzenegger signed a budget that is balanced for the current year but relies heavily on debt financing, like those of past administrations.

The $105 billion spending package avoids new taxes -- a Schwarzenegger pledge -- but uses money borrowed through bond sales to help pay this year's bills as well as past years' debts. Schwarzenegger had also pledged to stop the state's deficit spending habit.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; california; complex; million; schwarzenegger; sellsoff

1 posted on 08/01/2004 12:28:55 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Smart move, IMO. I know alot of big Calif. money is looking else where for better real estate returns..

FRegards,

2 posted on 08/01/2004 12:33:07 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Hillary's heart is blacker than the gut of a cave worm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange
Smart move, IMO. I know alot of big Calif. money is looking else where for better real estate returns..

On the contrary, Smart money is taking a profit in Calfornia Real Estate.

3 posted on 08/01/2004 12:45:38 PM PDT by jokar (On line data base http://www.trackingthethreat.com/db/index.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jokar
On the contrary, Smart money is taking a profit in Calfornia Real Estate.

Uh? I thought that is what I said....

Arnie sells...maybe near the top....I think that's smart. As I've read and know some whom have done the same...and are looking elsewhere to buy real estate.

Oh well....maybe I wasn't clear. Sorry.

4 posted on 08/01/2004 12:49:28 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Hillary's heart is blacker than the gut of a cave worm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jokar
On the contrary, Smart money is taking a profit in Calfornia Real Estate

Yeah no kidding. Back in 1998 when I bought my present home in Elk Grove, I lamented that I didn't have any capital to get in on the dotcom thing like many of my friends. They all lost their shirts and I've made $250,000 doing nothing but mowing my lawn and tinkering around the house.

5 posted on 08/01/2004 12:50:04 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (Santorum 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan; Osage Orange

It also appears that Arnie split lot as well.


6 posted on 08/01/2004 12:58:01 PM PDT by jokar (On line data base http://www.trackingthethreat.com/db/index.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Hmmm. I'm surprised that Arnold isn't required by California law to have his holdings, assets and investments in a blind trust. Maybe he does. Strange.


7 posted on 08/01/2004 1:06:28 PM PDT by Reagan Man (.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Hmmm. I'm surprised that Arnold isn't required by California law to have his holdings, assets and investments in a blind trust. Maybe he does. Strange.

A residence would naturally be exempt from any blind trust requirement.

8 posted on 08/01/2004 1:12:29 PM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
>>>A residence would naturally be exempt from any blind trust requirement.

Okay. Thought that applied to only a primary residence and possibly a vacation home. This was for three properties.

9 posted on 08/01/2004 1:18:30 PM PDT by Reagan Man (.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
This was for three properties.

It would appear that the compound was a single property when Arnold lived there in 2002. It was then his primary residence. He is now in the process of parceling the property and selling it off in pieces -- a smart move considering the real estate climate in California. Perhaps the State should start parceling some of its properties to pay down the deficit.

10 posted on 08/01/2004 1:30:17 PM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

I think the top was already reached.... I see LOTS OF SIGNS out there.


11 posted on 08/01/2004 1:44:40 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

They have talked about selling off certain state properties.....so has the federal government....that is why LAAFB and Miramar naval air station are toast.


12 posted on 08/01/2004 1:48:10 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
>>>He is now in the process of parceling the property and selling it off in pieces ...

Investment property. I guess there is no state law that requires elected govt officials to place their holdings, investments and general assets into a blind trust.

just curious. Thanks Phil.

13 posted on 08/01/2004 1:52:00 PM PDT by Reagan Man (.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Yeah no kidding. Back in 1998 when I bought my present home in Elk Grove, I lamented that I didn't have any capital to get in on the dotcom thing like many of my friends. They all lost their shirts

Oh no! Do they know where they might have misplaced them? They must be cold!

14 posted on 08/01/2004 1:54:17 PM PDT by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
I guess there is no state law that requires elected govt officials to place their holdings, investments and general assets into a blind trust.

No I don't believe there is. Nor do I believe that there ought to be. Do you believe that elected representatives should give up their right to control their own personal property? I sure don't. I think that they have a duty to avoid conflicts of interest, but that is as far as it goes. I see no conflict of interest in this transaction.

I see no reason why Arnold should even have to give up his day job to run this state. I wish all the representatives in this state had day jobs. I wish the represenatives would only meet for about 2 weeks out of the year to pass a budget and go home. We've got more laws on the books now than we could ever need.

15 posted on 08/01/2004 2:03:48 PM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Did Joe Kennedy make so much $ on booze that the grandkids can buy 3.4 Mil houses? Or does this Kennedy have a real job?


16 posted on 08/01/2004 3:31:15 PM PDT by DmBarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
>>>Do you believe that elected representatives should give up their right to control their own personal property?

No. My interest was strictly out of curiosity. Guess you missed that. I know there are strict conflict of interest statutes and codes of conduct restrictions pertaining to all federal government employees. I'm not familiar with individual state statutes.

>>>I wish the represenatives would only meet for about 2 weeks out of the year to pass a budget and go home.

Being a limited govt conservative, I would prefer that all elected officials limit their actual time spent in the halls of power. Although, two weeks might be too short. As far as I know, California is one of few states which has a full time legislature. Colorado has a part time legislature that includes 120-day sessions, term limits, small staffs, and strong deadlines and bill limitations.

17 posted on 08/01/2004 3:58:43 PM PDT by Reagan Man (.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

If I were California's dictator, I would have someone do a word count on the Calfornia statute books and then pass a law that says that the entire code cannot exceed that many words (say 1,500,000). That way, for every word of new legislation that is written, they would have to repeal the same number of words from other statutes. This way a lot of useless laws would have to be eliminated if the state felt that some new law was necessary.


18 posted on 08/01/2004 4:15:47 PM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
>>>>If I were California's dictator ...

You'd get my vote.

19 posted on 08/01/2004 4:28:24 PM PDT by Reagan Man (.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson