His cited sources are inadequate to support all his assertions and, even if they were, his interpretations must always be questioned, given his bias. But he's first class and can't be dismissed out of hand, or nit-picked away ala Luskin.
So there's a fair chance he's right; the Administration hasn't been spending tax money on Iraq and Krugman will have to explain that to the Hitchens and the Democrats.
Wouldn't that be a laugh?
Of course, the Republicans wouldn't be happy either. They'd have to explain why they weren't spending tax money on rebuilding either at home or abroad but rather giving it back to their rich supporters.
Apparently Krugman is saying the US used UN Oil-for-food money to supply Iraqis with food and other goods. With UN approval, even. I'm shocked!
The US has spent ZERO Iraqi dollars on any of their earmarked projects. The Interim Government has had access to those funds since they were turned over on 6/28. The UN refused to release the funds until the audit was complete. All this could be found on the CPA website during the occupation phase. It ended on 6/28 and the CPA left Iraq.