[whattajoke]

Humanistic science, however, has a tendency to declare things dogmatically that directly oppose Scripture

a) I'm not aware of the branch of science called "Humanistic science."
b) Don't anthropomorphicize science. It doesn't "declare" nor does it have "tendencies." It just is.
c) Scientific thought is not concerned with Scripture any more than it is concerned with the Quran, the Upinishads, the Norse mythology, or Navajo campfire stories. It just is.
d) Of course, maybe I'm wrong (something we say in science), so maybe you can point to me where science "directly opposes Scripture."*

*That is, in the sense in which you are speaking. Of course, science DOES indeed oppose scripture since there are no ghosts, no one rises from the dead, no one has changed water to wine, burning bushes have not been shown to speak, people have not been shown to live 900 years, plants have not been shown to live without sunlights, etc. But I know that's not your point, I digress and I apologize in advance.