[inquest]

So now there's a third category? Earlier you were castigating others for failing to distinguish between fact and opinion, but now it sounds like you're blurring the two yourself.

Fact is, matters of objective fact can still be "subject to interpretation". It just means that there can be a (single) correct interpretation, and (many) incorrect interpretations, of the evidence under examination.

[robertpaulsen]

"matters of objective fact can still be "subject to interpretation"."

Well, there's a statement for the books. 2 + 2 = subject to interpretation.

I'm done playing word games.