Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
"Secondly, nothing in that statement says anything to the effect that SCOTUS is the final authority on the meaning of the Constitution."

Well, what is it, inquest? First you say the SCOTUS appointed themselves final arbiters -- now you say they didn't.

Figure that out and then get back to me with your question.

638 posted on 08/10/2004 11:20:58 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
First you say the SCOTUS appointed themselves final arbiters

I was just following your lead on that. I wasn't making that claim myself.

If they didn't appoint themselves to that role, then who did?

639 posted on 08/10/2004 3:28:21 PM PDT by inquest (Judges are given the power to decide cases, not to decide law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 638 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson