No, there is not. The meaning is interpreted as times change, as technology changes.
Free speech includes nude dancing? Now who would have thought?
There is a right to privacy that allows a woman to murder her baby?
List for me all the rights covered by the 9th amendment. List for me all the state powers covered by the 10th. Define an "unreasonable search" or an "excessive bail", or a "speedy trial", or "keep and bear arms".
The founders didn't know the true meaning, yet you do? Or someone does? Who?
No, there is not. The meaning is interpreted as times change, as technology changes.
Free speech includes nude dancing? Now who would have thought?
There is a right to privacy that allows a woman to murder her baby?
List for me all the rights covered by the 9th amendment.
List for me all the state powers covered by the 10th.
Define an "unreasonable search" or an "excessive bail", or a "speedy trial", or "keep and bear arms".
The founders didn't know the true meaning, yet you do? Or someone does? Who?
Reasonable men know & can see the true meaning of our Constitution, paulsen..
Your sophomoric questions show that you are incapable.
That doesn't mean the interpretation is correct.
Free speech includes nude dancing?
No, despite the fact that someone's interpreted it to mean that. The meaning of free speech hasn't changed.
You're making a circular argument that amounts to the proposition that a court ruling, by definition, can't be wrong. If you're going to make that assumption, then there's nothing you can do to "prove" or "disprove" it. It's just an assumption.
The founders didn't know the true meaning
No, they knew what they were writing.