Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H
"that you believed in the "limited individual rights" model"

C'mon. Do you have to lie to make your point? I never said that.

I told you, I'm done. All you're doing is playing your little gotch game, trying to catch me in some inconsistency. I'm not playin', jerkoff.

You want to add something? Fine. You want to debate a point? Fine.

But this crap is a waste of my time. Adios.

510 posted on 08/04/2004 3:04:31 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
Do you have to lie to make your point? I never said that.

Here's the exchange:

I wrote: Now, how does robertpaulsen interpret the Second Amendment?

rp replied: I've always believed in the "standard model" (aka "traditional individual rights model) interpretation of the second amendment.

But the more case law I read, the more I'm drifting to the "limited individual rights model".

So you're somewhere between the "standard model" and "limited individual rights model", but drifting to the latter?

That's quite different than:

1) Your RKBA is defined and protected by your state constitution. That is my interpretation.

512 posted on 08/04/2004 3:18:58 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 510 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson