Like twisting this:
A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
into this?
Yes, the right of individuals to bear arms collectively in a militia for the security of a free state are protected from federal infringement.
The second amendment neither protects nor confers the right of individuals to bear arms outside of a militia. That protection comes from the state constitution. (from robertpaulsen's post #269 on this thread)
Now, does that represent the Courts' view, robertpaulsen's view, or both?
I am quoting case law.