Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
robertpaulsen said: "Yes, the right of individuals to bear arms collectively in a militia for the security of a free state are protected from federal infringement."

Pray tell, robertpaulsen, how does an individual KEEP and bear arms collectively?

Please explain what part of the remand of the US Supreme Court in US vs. Miller required militia participation on the part of Miller. (Hint: There was none.)

Please explain what requirements must be met for a person to be a member of the unorganized militia and how frequently such militia meets.

282 posted on 07/30/2004 6:57:31 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell
You are correct -- Miller is silent.

But the lower federal courts (save the 5th) have been quite vocal on the subject. Don't tell me I have to actually find a decision for you. Try Silveira V Lockyer for starters.

C'mon, you know this stuff almost as well as I do.

323 posted on 07/31/2004 7:07:45 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson