Quick Question: What is a .50 cal BMG rifle?

[inquest]

Look at it this way: You're conducting a criminal investigation, and you have piles of evidence laid before you regarding what actually happened. Obviously, there's only one right answer as to what happened, but that answer isn't itself obvious. Hence, you have to interpret the evidence, while remembering that there's only one right interpretation, and an infinite number of wrong ones.

It's the same with law. The meaning of certain provisions in law may at times not be immediately obvious upon initial examination, but that makes them no less matters of objective fact. So in determining the meaning of each provision, there is likewise only one right answer, and infinite wrong answers.

Now, I'll look forward to your finding something in there to quote out of context like you did with your last post.

[tpaine]

inquest wrote:

"matters of objective fact can still be "subject to interpretation"."

______________________________________

Well, there's a statement for the books. 2 + 2 = subject to interpretation.

I'm done playing word games.
660 paulsen

______________________________________

Neither of you two are ~ever~ done playing word games.

That's a fact.