Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IMRight
While Robinson's adds were a tad on the ugly side

Ugly? Please explain in detail. Seems you are mistaking bold self-promotion and satire for something else entirely.

15 posted on 08/15/2004 10:14:14 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: montag813
Ugly? Please explain in detail. Seems you are mistaking bold self-promotion and satire for something else entirely.

I made no mistake. He clearly violates the 11th commandment on a regular basis. Most of the candidates who lost in the original primary have endorsed Foxx. Not because of her views, but because of how poorly Vernon treated them in his adds. Frankly, we've got a lot of conservative candidates down here, and while Foxx is clearly LESS conservative (and unacceptable to me), she is not a "liberal".

The definition of "ugly adds" is when you stick your opponent's picture up next to Hillary and say "there's no difference".

"Self promotion"??? He has run almost no adds talking about his resume and/or experience. Almost everything is about how liberal his opponents are.

And understand this is coming from a BIG Robinson supporter. I've contributed to his campaign (and voted for him) and prefer him over all of the people he ran against.

I just hate local politics.

I suspect that once he's won, he will reserve his bomb throwing for the other party and will not draw primary opponents. I guess the time to mend party fenses is AFTER you win.

16 posted on 08/16/2004 5:07:56 AM PDT by IMRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson