Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: familyofman

"think like that 'poor woman' at her kitchen table, or a 'spinmeister' for the dems. There is an awful lot of ammo in this report - trying to lay the blame off on a prior POTUS will seem silly and shirking responsibilty, in other words - 'that dog won't hunt'."

The report clearly indicates that individuals with lower incomes (any less than $200,000) gained in income. In other words, there are fewer poor women sitting at the table according to this data. Wealthier incomes suffered substantial losses. In your logic, democrats will exploit the tragedy of the wealthy becoming "poor?!" This does not make sense.

CNN.com now has this as the lead article. The significance here is the media spin to pretend that the data implicates average americans negatively rather than highlighting the truer statement-- the wealthy have taken a huge financial hit.


42 posted on 07/29/2004 7:19:12 AM PDT by lonestar67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: lonestar67

See 38. it's all about Hillary!ous.


44 posted on 07/29/2004 7:20:24 AM PDT by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson