Skip to comments.
Fmr. Ambassador Ray Flynn: Democrats Exclude Catholics from the Democrat National Convention
NewsMax.com ^
| 07.28.04
Posted on 07/28/2004 10:36:27 AM PDT by Coleus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
07/28/2004 10:36:32 AM PDT
by
Coleus
Ray Flynn was Clinton's only pro-life apointee as U.S. Ambassador to the Vatican from 1993-97 and was Mayor of Boston from 1984-93.
He supported President Bush in 2000 and will vote for him again in 2004.
2
posted on
07/28/2004 10:37:52 AM PDT
by
Coleus
(Brooke Shields killed her children? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1178497/posts)
To: hobbes1; dubyaismypresident
3
posted on
07/28/2004 10:44:52 AM PDT
by
xsmommy
To: Coleus
Flynn suggests that Kerry could serve himself better by being more overt with his own faith. I'm not sure what Flynn means here - Kerry is VERY overt with his faith. He worships himself, as anyone with eyes can see.
4
posted on
07/28/2004 10:50:01 AM PDT
by
jscd3
To: Coleus
5
posted on
07/28/2004 10:53:44 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
("A republic, if we can revive it")
To: Coleus
Many Pennsylvanians watched the treatment of Democrat Gov. Bob Casey at the Democrat National Convention in New York City. The Democrats humiliated Bob Casey and refused to allow him to speak. They are an oppressive regime with tight controls on everyone. No pro life person will be allowed any part in the Boston convention. We do know that Ted Kennedy, Sandy Berger, Danny Rostenkowski, Bobby Toricelli and a disbarred lawyer named Clinton are all welcome. Democrats are a narrow minded group of controlling leftists.
To: Coleus
Ray Flynn sold out to BJ Clinton in the '90s and was rewarded with the Ambassadorship to The Vatican.
Ray must have seen the error of his ways; a true contrition cleanses the soul. I sure hope so, as we could use Ambassador Flynn on our side.
To: Coleus
"Kerry is the first Roman Catholic from a major political party to seek the presidency in 44 years. "If Kerry goes down it will be another 44 years for the Democrats and never for the Republicans. Their influence has been successfully neutralized.
8
posted on
07/28/2004 11:31:19 AM PDT
by
ex-snook
("BUT ABOVE ALL THINGS, TRUTH BEARETH AWAY THE VICTORY")
To: Coleus
Ping. I will be posting a here-to-fore unpublished interview with Ambassador Flynn very shortly...
9
posted on
07/28/2004 11:45:17 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...
10
posted on
07/28/2004 11:46:43 AM PDT
by
Coleus
(Brooke Shields killed her children? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1178497/posts)
To: Coleus
Who is Ray Flynn going to vote for?
To: Coleus
If he is for Bush, why doesn't he speak for him and for pro-life policies at the Republican Convention? Wouldn't that be the "Catholic" thing to do - to defend innocent life against Kerry and his wild-eyed baby-killing supporters???
To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
If he is for Bush, why doesn't he speak for him and for pro-life policies at the Republican Convention? Wouldn't that be the "Catholic" thing to do - to defend innocent life against Kerry and his wild-eyed baby-killing supporters??? >>
He would then lose his tax-exempt 501(c)3 status from his Your Catholic Voice organization. He has said many times on the Fox News Channel, FNC, that he voted for Pres. Bush in the 2002 election.
13
posted on
07/28/2004 11:58:11 AM PDT
by
Coleus
(Brooke Shields killed her children? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1178497/posts)
To: oldironsides
I voted for McGovern, Carter, Reagan (to get rid of Carter), Mondale (because of the lousy job Reagan did in his second term as Calif. Gov.) and Dukakis. Then, Hillary Clinton kept Bob Casey from addressing the 1992 Democratic convention with the message that Dems could be pro-life. I have not voted for a Democrat since that day, the day the Dems officially became totally and stridently anti-life.
14
posted on
07/28/2004 12:32:49 PM PDT
by
jjmcgo
To: Coleus
"He has said many times on the Fox News Channel, FNC, that he voted for Pres. Bush in the 2002 election."
I assume you meant in 2000.
It's too bad that Massachusetts Democrats split up Boston into 2 congressional districts, one of which is dominated by Cambridge and other northern suburbs and the other which is dominated by southern suburbs. If they kept Boston whole, Ray Flynn could be a pro-life Congressman from a district that gave Bush less than 20% of the vote in 2000!
15
posted on
07/28/2004 12:40:00 PM PDT
by
AuH2ORepublican
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: jscd3
To the Dems, the only good Catholic is a cafeteria Catholic.
16
posted on
07/28/2004 12:42:53 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Rain, rain, go away)
To: Coleus
I hope that it helps more than last time. Gore did well among Irish-Americans in the last election, one of the reasons the northeast was so heavily 'Rat.
Ex-Boston Dem Mayor Says Party 'Out of Touch' With American ValuesBy Roch Hammond
CNSNews.com Correspondent
July 28, 2004
(CNSNews.com) - Ray Flynn, former three-term Democratic mayor of Boston and the Clinton administration's ambassador to the Vatican, said the "core values" shared by Catholics and most Americans are being ignored at the Democratic National Convention and are absent from the Democratic Party platform.
Flynn said the Democratic National Convention being held in Boston is not reflective of how average working people in America feel on a number of important issues.
"The Democratic Party delegates, hierarchy, [and] leadership are out of touch with American mainstream values," Flynn stated.
Flynn and other pro-life Democrats are unhappy with the Democratic Party and candidate John Kerry for their views on issues such as abortion. While Kerry, a Catholic, has stated that he believes "life begins at conception," he has maintained that he does not want to impose his Catholic beliefs on others and supports a female's right to an abortion.
Kerry has voted against bans on "partial-birth" abortion and has garnered the enthusiastic support of groups like Planned Parenthood, which actually provides abortions, as well as NARAL Pro-Choice America and the National Organization for Women, which aggressively lobby for abortion rights.
Flynn noted that Democrats did not allow the late Bob Casey, popular former Democratic governor of Pennsylvania (1987-1995), to speak at their conventions on several occasions because of his "pro-life" and Catholic beliefs.
"What's so wrong with having a diversity of opinion on important issues in a major political party?" Flynn asked.
The former Boston mayor claims that the voices of average Americans and pro-life Democrats are being ignored because politics are "controlled, influenced and manipulated" by the money and pull of special interest groups.
"[T]he feminists, the left-wing groups -- they're the ones that have the great impact on the Democratic Party now," Flynn said. "Where are the voices of just average people out there?"
While Flynn pointed to the discontent among pro-life Democrats, Catholics and other Americans for the way Democratic leaders are "evading" certain issues, he was not impressed with the Republican Party's ability to address the concerns of average Americans either.
Those average Americans "don't believe either party welcomes them with open arms," according to Flynn.
Politicians from both parties need to be more "open" and "respectful" of the views of average Americans, Flynn said, but he added that the burden rests not only with the politicians. Catholics, as well as others who believe in American "core values," also have the "responsibility to get politically involved" to ensure that their views are being addressed by the major parties, he said.
Officials from the Democratic National Committee did not return repeated phone calls requesting comment for this article.
Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.
18
posted on
07/28/2004 5:29:25 PM PDT
by
Coleus
(Brooke Shields killed her children? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1178497/posts)
To: AuH2ORepublican
Lynch, who is both prolife and endorsed by the NRA, won the district to the south.
19
posted on
07/29/2004 4:19:58 AM PDT
by
Meldrim
To: Meldrim
According to the National Right to Life Committee, Stephen Lynch only votes pro-life about half the time. In 2003, he voted the right way on the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban and its hostile amendments, but in 2002 he voted in favor of the sham substitute to the PBA Ban that would have allowed late-term abortions so long as the woman's "health" (including emotional and mental "health") was at risk, which basically wouldn't have banned a single abortion. In addition, Lynch voted (i) in favor of the sham substitute to the Unborn Victims of Violence Act (it would have denied that there were two victims when someone kills a pregnant woman and her baby, and would not have charged someone with murder if the unborn baby dies but the woman lives), (ii) in favor of funding for the UN Population Fund (that carries out coercive abortions in places like China), (iii) in favor of Jim Greenwood's "clone-and-kill" sham substitute to the Weldon-Stupak Human Cloning Ban, (iv) in favor of a hostile motion to the Abortion Non-Discrimination Act (the Act prohibits states from discriminating against doctors, hospitals and HMOs that refuse to carry out or pay for abortions), and (v) in favor of the sham substitute amendment to the Child Custody Protection Act, which amendment would have allowed an adult sibling, grandparent, minister, rabbi, pastor, priest, or other religious leader to transport minors across state lines for abortions in violation of state parental notification laws. Here is Lynch's voting record as per NRTL:
http://www.capwiz.com/nrlc/bio/keyvotes/?id=4040
However, after looking at the voting record of the supposedly pro-life Congressman Richard Neal of Springfield, it is clear that Lynch has the least pro-abortion voting record in the Massachusetts congressional delegation (Neal only votes for final passage of very popular pro-life bills, and one cannot count on his support on any important vote), so I thank you for calling to my attention Lynch's abortion position.
BTW, if Boston was kept wholly within a single congressional district, I think either Ray Flynn or Stephen Lynch would be elected to Congress over ultra pro-abort Michael Capuano from Somerville, who would be out of a job (Capuano won the primary because of his support from ultraliberals in Cambridge and surrounding townships). And if the suburbs south of Boston were kept together, the congressman would likely be either a pro-life Democrat or a pro-life Republican. So stand by my assertion that splitting Boston up into two congressional districts ends up helping the pro-aborts.
20
posted on
07/29/2004 8:59:00 AM PDT
by
AuH2ORepublican
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson