Posted on 07/27/2004 8:31:10 PM PDT by take
Medicare Will Foot the Bill for an Initial Exam at 65
ASHINGTON, July 27 - The Bush administration announced plans on Tuesday to pay for initial comprehensive physical examinations for new Medicare beneficiaries, starting next year, and it said Medicare would also cover screening tests for cholesterol and diabetes for people already in the program.
As a result of incremental changes in the last few years, Medicare now covers a wide variety of preventive services.
The latest changes, authorized by the new Medicare law, take effect on Jan. 1, a year before outpatient drug benefits will become available.
The "welcome to Medicare physical'' for new beneficiaries includes influenza and hepatitis B vaccines, mammograms, Pap smears and pelvic examinations and screening tests for prostate cancer, colon cancer, glaucoma and osteoporosis, among other conditions.
Medicare will cover such services as part of "an initial preventive physical examination'' within six months after a person enrolls in Medicare. Congress assumed that such examinations would help doctors diagnose problems early, when treatment could be more effective.
Many beneficiaries have told federal interviewers that they did not seek such tests and services because they did not think they were needed.
As part of the physical examination, Medicare will also pay for an electrocardiogram; an assessment of a person's risk of depression; hearing and vision tests; and a review of a person's ability to perform activities like bathing, dressing, eating and getting in and out of bed.
Doctors will be expected to ask patients about their diet, their physical and social activities, their work history and any use of alcohol, tobacco or illicit drugs. The government will also pay doctors to provide education and counseling for any medical problems detected in the examination.
While each new beneficiary is entitled to coverage for one comprehensive physical, Medicare will pay for diabetes screening tests twice a year for people who have a high risk of the disease. It will also pay for blood tests every five years to detect cardiovascular disease in people with no apparent symptoms, including analysis of total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein and triglycerides.
In the past, the Medicare law explicitly barred payment for "routine physical checkups.''
Tommy G. Thompson, the secretary of health and human services, said: "Medicare had it backwards, spending 99 percent of its resources treating seniors after they got sick and only 1 percent on preventing illness and promoting wellness. With the new law, we are reversing this trend and focusing more on disease prevention and management."
Doctors and health advocacy groups like the American Cancer Society lobbied for Medicare coverage of routine physical examinations and tests. They welcomed the new benefit on Tuesday, even as they expressed concern about cutbacks in Medicare payments for cancer drugs provided in doctors' offices.
Wendy K. D. Selig, vice president of the American Cancer Society, said: "We are pleased that the administration is moving ahead with coverage of physical examinations. But we are very concerned about proposed changes in reimbursement for cancer chemotherapy in a physician's office and how that will affect patients.''
The Bush administration contends that Medicare has paid far more than market prices for cancer drugs, and that the cuts will be offset by increases in Medicare payments to doctors who administer the drugs.
Deborah Y. Kamin, director of cancer policy at the American Society of Clinical Oncology, rejected that view, saying, "No one believes that the changes in practice expense payments will offset the cuts.''
The administration also announced that Medicare would increase payments to doctors, for services covered under the Medicare fee schedule, by 1.5 percent next year.
Dr. Mark B. McClellan, administrator of the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said payments would have been cut at least 3.6 percent next year if Congress had not taken action to guarantee the increase.
Under rules proposed by the Bush administration on Tuesday, Medicare would make extra "incentive payments'' in areas where doctors are in short supply.
Democrats generally supported the new preventive benefits, but many voted against the Medicare legislation, contending that it was overly generous to insurance and pharmaceutical companies. Senator Bill Frist, the majority leader, said Democrats "tried to block, and ultimately voted against, the most significant improvement in health care for seniors and individuals with disabilities in two generations.''
Hey its my money
Well I don't have a problem with this. If people choose to go on Medicare then I think mandatory physical exams are a good idea. I agree with Tommy Thompson, and an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Maybe it could save taxpayers money in the long run.
Nothing is too good for the taxpayers.
Oh, how I hate this....
"choose to go on Medicare?" At 65 you really have little choice from what I understand.
You have NO choice, you will not get your SS money
Is bush purposely trying to get rid of his core with this stuff?
Big mistake, the senior sodomites here is Seattle will bankrupt us within weeks - demanding free proctology exams
Adolf Hitler would Love you
Medicare exams = police state? So that's all Saddam was guilty of, screening for high cholesterol among retirees? (sheesh)
IMMIGRATION
mandatory physical exams= Is A PoliceState
TROLLS
Doctors inform state about his admission
Martha Raffaele
Associated Press
Jul. 15, 2004 12:00 AM
HARRISBURG, Pa. - A man who told his doctors that he drinks more than a six-pack of beer per day is now fighting to get his driver's license back because the physicians apparently reported him to the state.
Keith Emerich, 44, said Tuesday that he disclosed his drinking habit in February to doctors who were treating him at a hospital for an irregular heartbeat.
"I told them it was over a six-pack a day. It wasn't good for me; I'm not going to lie," Emerich said in a tele- phone interview from his home in Lebanon, about 30 miles east of Harrisburg.
Emerich received a notice from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation in April that his license was being revoked effective May 6 for medical reasons related to substance abuse. He has petitioned a judge to restore the license, and a hearing has been set for July 29.
A state law dating to the 1960s requires doctors to report any physical or mental impairments that could compromise a patient's ability to drive safely, PennDOT spokeswoman Joan Nissley said. Nissley said she could not discuss the details of Emerich's case because of confidentiality requirements that also protect the doctor from being identified.
The law requires revocation of the license until the driver can prove he is competent to drive.
Emerich said his heart problem has prompted him to limit his beer drinking to weekends. Aside from a drunken-driving conviction when he was 21, Emerich, a pressman at a print shop who lives alone, said he has a clean driving record and does not drink and drive.
"What I do in the privacy of my own home is none of PennDOT's business," he said.
Asked if he considered his client to be alcoholic, Horace Ehrgood, Emerich's attorney, said: "It depends on what your definition is.
"He's been able to go to work, and he's got a heck of a nice work record. He's been able to function in all other avenues of life," the lawyer said.
Pennsylvania's transportation a- gency receives about 40,000 medical reports and revokes 5,000 to 6,000 licenses a year but does not keep any statistics on its reasons for doing so, Nissley said. She also said she did not know how many revocations get appealed.
Pennsylvania is one of six states that require doctors to report motorists with medical conditions that could affect their driving, according to the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators. The other states are California, Delaware, Oregon, Nevada, and New Jersey.
All other states and the District of Columbia allow physicians to submit reports on a voluntary basis.
So you are opposed to mandatory physical exams for immigrants, as well?
mandatory physical exams are not FREEDOM of choice
No one forces anyone to come to America, just as no one forces anyone to subscribe to medical services.
I don't think this article is referring to Part A (hospital insurance, which only covers in-patient treatment or home health aides),the automatic portion of Medicare. This sounds like something covered under Part B (medical insurance), which is voluntary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.