Its funny how that there has been absolutely no conclusive proof as to homosexuality being "genetic" yet the theory of homosexuality being "genetically" based and that gays are "born that way" is touted as being "set in stone."
It's a politically motivated position. Gay essentialism gives gays minority status equivalent to race and, if the argument were fully accepted in court, subject laws against homosexual behavior to strict scrutiny. Which is the whole idea. Every initiative of the gay cabal has been aimed toward winning court cases predicated on denial of rights, arguing analogically from the civil rights movement. Their public propaganda has been geared toward preparing the ground for those court cases, to obtain the acquiescence of the public to the court victories after the fact -- not to secure a favorable consensus for legislation. See this interview, page five:
Evan Wolfson interview, 2001, post James Dale and Baehr vs. Lewin (Hawaiian SSM lawsuit).
The Supreme Court basically bought into essentialism with Lawrence because five justices were determined to do so, even if it meant overturning precedent set less than 20 years ago by the Supreme Court itself. Never sell the Big Lie technique short -- Madsen and Kirk, GLAAD and the HRC, have made it work like a cheap watch. The problem is, the logical sequel is that democracy is ineffectual, because the 2% stuffed the 98% -- and worthless, because we've demonstrated that we can't defend our basic institutions against a determined, sociopathic minoritarian attack.
We still have one last chance, with an amendment to the Constitution. Failing that, they win everything and promptly begin persecuting churches, as per my post above. No holdouts, and no prisoners.
And then NAMBLA comes for the kids.