Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHO KNEW? (why did Clinton And Berger coverup Berger's criminal investigation)
THE AMERICAN THINKER ^ | July 27th, 2004 | CLARICE FELDMAN

Posted on 07/27/2004 8:54:56 AM PDT by Liz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Liz

So that they could convince Kerry to make Berger his top aide. That way the Clintons could pull the rug out from under him as the election nears.


21 posted on 07/27/2004 12:18:18 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I like to use the enemy's quips against them. It is sort of like some of the martial arts techniques.


22 posted on 07/27/2004 3:26:03 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (They are where you least expect. Look around and you'll see them too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy

It's called "hoisting them on their own petard."


23 posted on 07/27/2004 4:02:12 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Liz

True. But in may forms of martial arts you use the attackers force against them. I am not into MA because I pack heat.


24 posted on 07/27/2004 4:13:32 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (They are where you least expect. Look around and you'll see them too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy

In that case, who needs MA?


25 posted on 07/27/2004 4:36:08 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Liz

true.


26 posted on 07/27/2004 4:38:03 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (They are where you least expect. Look around and you'll see them too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Liz
You Beat me to It!!

Under Oath means NOTHING to these scum.

27 posted on 07/27/2004 4:59:41 PM PDT by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Doc On The Bay

Self-absorbed suckers eh? Nobody matters to them but themselves. How can you tell?

B/c they're constantly bleating how "tolerant and compassionate" they are. Sure tipoff.

Besides, there's always some liberal willing to say he's for his fellow man and hoping to make a buck on it.


28 posted on 07/27/2004 6:11:30 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Are you kidding - me?????? You know full well that Kerry knew!


29 posted on 07/27/2004 6:14:20 PM PDT by onyx eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx eyes

Think of it this way: It's more egregious if he didn't know b/c of Clinton and Berger's negligence.


30 posted on 07/27/2004 6:36:08 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: onyx eyes
Think of it this way: It's more egregious if he didn't know


Number one, it places into question Kerry 's national security abilities by not knowing his own adviser was under criminal investigation for ntl security breaches.


Number two, it underlines the pattern of Clinton and Berger's negligence and implies they were conspiring against Kerry (and the party) to keep them in the dark.

Number three, it suggests Clinton and Berger have details about national security in the run up to 9/11 that have yet to be revealed.

Shall I go on?
31 posted on 07/27/2004 6:45:43 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Liz
HOW SAD that we must Come to the Position that we Believe This of our "Putative Leaders!!"

Our "Government" is in "Disrepair,"--&--at Least--there are Still a Few of Us who can See our Peril!

Doc

32 posted on 07/27/2004 6:51:47 PM PDT by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Doc On The Bay

The Clinton Legacy lives on in Berger's pants.


33 posted on 07/27/2004 6:55:07 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Liz
HOW SAD, our Great Republic may have come to This!!
34 posted on 07/27/2004 6:59:38 PM PDT by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: livius

"I am hoping that the length of this investigation indicates that not only Berger, but the persons who permitted him to get away with this (as well as the one who no doubt initially asked him to do it) will be prosecuted as well. Then maybe the press won't be able to ignore it."

I think it has been confirmed that this matter has been (and still is) being investigated by a grand jury. I'm not sure the spin machine can handle multiple indictments for felonies.


35 posted on 07/27/2004 8:30:04 PM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ben Hecks
I'm not sure the spin machine can handle multiple indictments for felonies.

I sure hope not - but about the only thing I really have confidence in these days is the limitless corruption of the Clintonoids and their limitless resourcefulness in getting out of the consequences of their actions.

36 posted on 07/28/2004 4:13:35 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Under oath? Please..... oaths, laws, rules, regulations, our constitution, etc, mean nothing to these criminals.

1.Andrew Jackson was once fined 1000.00 dollars for contempt of court.

2. Bill Clinton was fined 90,000 dollars for giving false testimony and false avidavits under oath in Judge Susan Wright's court room.

3. Congress, some years later, voted to give Jackson his money back plus interest.

4. (Under Construction - please stop by at a latter date)

37 posted on 07/28/2004 8:46:13 AM PDT by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: New Perspective

Soon to be on the sale rack with Bill Clinton's "My Life".

38 posted on 07/28/2004 12:17:42 PM PDT by Frances_Marion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Liz
The real story is the self-destructive behavior of the press, which is willing to dump whatever shred of credibility it retains to help a man who is gullible enough to put his faith in Clarke and Wilson and Berger.

This is one damning article and has been forwarded to many. Behavior such as Sandy Bergers must be penalized and the George W. Bush' D.O.J. refuses to do so, then I will have finally lost all hope in our Gov't. I still cannot fathom if this was a Repub. that took S.B.'s actions, just how loud and daily the screaming would be in every facet of our jaded media. I hope I don't get embarrassed once again.

39 posted on 07/28/2004 2:08:23 PM PDT by Pagey ("Hillary Rodham Clinton is not worthy to hold the position of 'Senator of N.Y'.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pagey

Great you passed the word along. The more people that are clued in to what's going on the better. Mediots want to keep this quiet.

Keep in mind that the DOJ won't lay this out without convincing evidence. Berger could be charged with an assortment of crimes over and above the obvious security theft. And on the plus side, there are witnesses, possibly videos, to Berger's thievery.

Berger said he made cellphone calls....that could also be evidence especially if there were no phone calls. The absence of calls would reinforce Berger's malicious plan to rid the room of monitors so he could steal.

Conniving CYA Berger knows that which is why he has already admitted to the crime (Clintonoids don't normally admit to wrongdoing).


40 posted on 07/28/2004 2:25:37 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson