Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CARTER'S REMARKS TO THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION, BOSTON (Super Barf Alert)
Drudge ^ | July 26, 2004 | Mr. Peanut

Posted on 07/26/2004 7:39:08 PM PDT by dr_who_2

CARTER'S REMARKS TO THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION, BOSTON
Mon Jul 26 2004 19:45:57 ET

My name is Jimmy Carter, and I'm not running for president. But here's what I will be doing: everything I can to put John Kerry in the White House with John Edwards right there beside him.

Twenty-eight years ago I was running for president, and I said then, "I want a government as good and as honest and as decent and as competent and as compassionate as are the American people." I say this again tonight, and that is exactly what we will have next January with John Kerry as president of the United States.

As many of you know, my first chosen career was in the United States Navy, where I served as a submarine officer. At that time, my shipmates and I were ready for combat and prepared to give our lives to defend our nation and its principles.

At the same time, we always prayed that our readiness would preserve the peace. I served under two presidents, Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower, men who represented different political parties. Both of whom had faced their active military responsibilities with honor.

They knew the horrors of war, and later, as commanders-in-chief, they exercised restraint and judgment and had a clear sense of mission. We had confidence that our leaders, military and civilian, would not put our soldiers and sailors in harm's way by initiating "wars of choice" unless America's vital interests were endangered.

We also were sure that these presidents would not mislead us when it came to issues involving our nation's security. Today, our Democratic party is led by another former naval officer -- one who volunteered for military service. He showed up when assigned to duty, and he served with honor and distinction.

He also knows the horrors of war and the responsibilities of leadership, and I am confident that next January he will restore the judgment and maturity to our government that is sorely lacking today. I am proud to call Lieutenant John Kerry my shipmate, and I am ready to follow him to victory in November.

As you know, our country faces many challenges at home involving energy, taxation, the environment, education, and health. To meet these challenges, we need new leaders in Washington whose policies are shaped by working American families instead of the super-rich and their armies of lobbyists. But the biggest reason to make John Kerry president is even more important. It is to safeguard the security of our nation.

Today, our dominant international challenge is to restore the greatness of America -- based on telling the truth, a commitment to peace, and respect for civil liberties at home and basic human rights around the world. Truth is the foundation of our global leadership, but our credibility has been shattered and we are left increasingly isolated and vulnerable in a hostile world. Without truth -- without trust -- America cannot flourish. Trust is at the very heart of our democracy, the sacred covenant between the president and the people.

When that trust is violated, the bonds that hold our republic together begin to weaken. After 9/11, America stood proud, wounded but determined and united. A cowardly attack on innocent civilians brought us an unprecedented level of cooperation and understanding around the world. But in just 34 months, we have watched with deep concern as all this goodwill has been squandered by a virtually unbroken series of mistakes and miscalculations. Unilateral acts and demands have isolated the United States from the very nations we need to join us in combating terrorism.

Let us not forget that the Soviets lost the Cold War because the American people combined the exercise of power with adherence to basic principles, based on sustained bipartisan support. We understood the positive link between the defense of our own freedom and the promotion of human rights. Recent policies have cost our nation its reputation as the world's most admired champion of freedom and justice. What a difference these few months of extremism have made!

The United States has alienated its allies, dismayed its friends, and inadvertently gratified its enemies by proclaiming a confused and disturbing strategy of "preemptive" war. With our allies disunited, the world resenting us, and the Middle East ablaze, we need John Kerry to restore life to the global war against terrorism.

In the meantime, the Middle East peace process has come to a screeching halt for the first time since Israel became a nation. All former presidents, Democratic and Republican, have attempted to secure a comprehensive peace for Israel with hope and justice for the Palestinians. The achievements of Camp David a quarter century ago and the more recent progress made by President Bill Clinton are now in peril.

Instead, violence has gripped the Holy Land, with the region increasingly swept by anti-American passions. Elsewhere, North Korea's nuclear menace -- a threat far more real and immediate than any posed by Saddam Hussein -- has been allowed to advance unheeded, with potentially ominous consequences for peace and stability in Northeast Asia. These are some of the prices of our government's radical departure from the basic American principles and values espoused by John Kerry!

In repudiating extremism we need to recommit ourselves to a few common- sense principles that should transcend partisan differences. First, we cannot enhance our own security if we place in jeopardy what is most precious to us, namely, the centrality of human rights in our daily lives and in global affairs. Second, we cannot maintain our historic self-confidence as a people if we generate public panic. Third, we cannot do our duty as citizens and patriots if we pursue an agenda that polarizes and divides our country. Next, we cannot be true to ourselves if we mistreat others. And finally, in the world at large we cannot lead if our leaders mislead.

You can't be a war president one day and claim to be a peace president the next, depending on the latest political polls. When our national security requires military action, John Kerry has already proven in Vietnam that he will not hesitate to act. And as a proven defender of our national security, John Kerry will strengthen the global alliance against terrorism while avoiding unnecessary wars.

Ultimately, the issue is whether America will provide global leadership that springs from the unity and integrity of the American people or whether extremist doctrines and the manipulation of truth will define America's role in the world.

At stake is nothing less than our nation's soul. In a few months, I will, God willing, enter my 81st year of my life, and in many ways the last few months have been some of the most disturbing of all. But I am not discouraged. I do not despair for our country. I believe tonight, as I always have, that the essential decency, compassion and common sense of the American people will prevail.

And so I say to you and to others around the world, whether they wish us well or ill: do not underestimate us Americans. We lack neither strength nor wisdom. There is a road that leads to a bright and hopeful future. What America needs is leadership. Our job, my fellow Americans, is to ensure that the leaders of this great country will be John Kerry and John Edwards. Thank you and God bless America!


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1976to1980sucked; 22pctinflation; day444; desertone; dncconvention; jimmycarter; kerry; liberalidiot; liberaloldcranks; miseryindex; peanutboy; thereyougoagain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: phil_will1

Yeah, I liked that statement too .. but Jimmy has no idea the dems no long have "essential decency, compassion and common sense".

However, the statement I keyed in on was this: "At stake is nothing less than our nation's soul."

This election in 2004 will set the tone for the direction America will take for the next 40-50 years .. and it appears Jimmy knows it too.


41 posted on 07/26/2004 8:42:49 PM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: America is the Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dr_who_2

America's greatness rests on a 'foundation of truth'as sayeth the Democrat former president at the 2004 DNC convention.

And who better to exemplify that 'foundation of truth' than the Clintons?

A major reason 50,000,000+ Americans can't stand to listen to Democrats is because they wouldn't recognize 'truth' if it knocked and sat on them.


42 posted on 07/26/2004 8:46:03 PM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr_who_2
Jimmah Carter: "In a few months, I will, God willing, enter my 81st year of my life, and in many ways the last few months have been some of the most disturbing of all."

No Jimmah -- the "most disturbing" months of all were still the 48 months of 1976-1980.

43 posted on 07/26/2004 8:51:32 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dyed_in_the_wool
You've nailed it! That's pretty much what I was yelling at my TV when he was speaking, except for a couple of things that would get this Web site shut down. If a schlub like that could become President, there's hope for every ape in Africa.
44 posted on 07/26/2004 9:02:24 PM PDT by Uncle Vlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dyed_in_the_wool

"He is arguably the worst FP president since, well, uh, since, hey, I don't want to put down James K. Polk again."

Drop the "arguably" and you'll get some agreement that Carter was THE worst foreign policy president of the US ever.

I think Polk was a great foreign policy president, however--one of the very best.


45 posted on 07/26/2004 9:18:15 PM PDT by labard1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dr_who_2

JC is a stool sample.


46 posted on 07/26/2004 9:19:02 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (" Permitting homosexuality didn't work out very well for the Roman Empire")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

"Why are you putting down Polk? He added a million square miles to the US, including California. On second thought...."

Funny, but I KNOW you don't blame Polk for what's happened to California. Also, remember that although Reagan was born in Illinois, it was California that first made him an elected official and gave him the experience that made his Presidential run plausible. California hasn't always been as bad as it is today.



47 posted on 07/26/2004 9:24:17 PM PDT by labard1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dyed_in_the_wool

Worst during and biggest muckraker since leaving office.

Carter was there to be the "god" voice for the democrats. His use of "god" was an intentional effort to immunize the convention from all the ANTI-religion that is going to come (and was previewed tonight)

He does not mention giving away the panama canal.

He does not mention ALMOST giving away south america to the commies.

He does not mention his incompetence with the ecconomy.

He does nto mention his incompetence in negotiating with the USSR.

carter represents the FEAR of action that nearly destroyed the USA.

The French socialists hate the USA, they will ALWAYS hate the USA. Get over it.


48 posted on 07/26/2004 9:26:52 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dr_who_2

If Carter were President we would all be dead!!!


49 posted on 07/26/2004 9:49:27 PM PDT by Brimack34 (If Kerry wins we will all speak French.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marvlus

not to mention that Carter is responsible for the mullahs who are now working overtime to get the A-bomb.

Thanks jimmy.


50 posted on 07/26/2004 10:10:53 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Brimack34

If carter were president it would be "Amerika" with the USA being broken up under French and USSR supervision because we were too powerful.


51 posted on 07/26/2004 10:13:14 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: dr_who_2

In 1979, Treasury Bonds were yielding about 11 to 12%.

People who bought then and are still holding, are getting that rate until 2009.


52 posted on 07/27/2004 7:03:25 AM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson