Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Grants Protection for Anti-Tehran Group in Iraq (People’s Mujahedin)
Reuters ^ | Jul 26, 2004

Posted on 07/26/2004 2:07:39 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

PARIS (Reuters) - The U.S. military has granted "protected status" under the Geneva Convention to members of an exiled Iranian opposition group interned in Iraq, France-based exiles and U.S. officials said on Monday.

The U.S. head of detainee operations in Iraq, Major-General Geoffrey Miller, told the People's Mujahideen Organization (MKO) its members held at a base in eastern Iraq had been recognized as "protected persons under the Fourth Geneva Convention."

"(This is a) triumph for the Iranian Resistance and the Iranian people," Maryam Rajavi, head of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), said in a statement.

The United States confirmed it gave 3,800 Iranian rebels at the Ashraf base in Iraq protected status because Washington believed they had not been combatants in the war when U.S.-led forces invaded Iraq.

The decision will allow detainees from the group access to the Red Cross and the U.N. refugee agency, the UNHCR.

But a State Department spokesman said the protected status did not affect the group's designation by Washington as a "terrorist group" and its members in Ashraf were still being vetted to determine what crimes they may have committed.

Iran regards the MKO fighters in Iraq as one of its biggest external threats and wants the group's members handed over.

Diplomats say Tehran offered to exchange al Qaeda prisoners it is holding for MKO leaders but Washington refused the swap.

What to do with the rebels was a "conundrum," a State Department official who asked not to be named, said.

"They probably have a well-founded fear of persecution in Iran. Iraq does not want them. And a lot of countries have not yet agreed to take then -- and wherever they go it has to be voluntary," he said.

Iranian government spokesman Abdollah Ramazanzadeh said the U.S. move to grant the MKO protected status undermined Washington's claims to be fighting terrorist groups.

"I hope those who claim they are combating terrorism prove the truth and confront the ones who have committed extensive crimes against the Iranian nation," he told a news conference.

In August last year, the United States closed the Washington offices of the NCRI and MKO, also known by its Iranian name Mujahideen-e Khalq (MEK).

French intelligence suspected the group of planning to make its Paris base a center from which to launch attacks on Iranian embassies in Europe. The group denies any such ambition. (Additional reporting by Saul Hudson in Washington)


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: mek; mko; mujahedeenekhalq; mujahedeenkhalq
This group of Communist Jihadist terrorists was Pro-Saddam and was a recipient of Oil for Food money.


Mujahedin Al-Khalq

1 posted on 07/26/2004 2:07:41 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
I suspect some disinformation in this and perhaps some *signals*.

These guys may know a lot we need to know. The mullahs sound a tad peeved. The Mujahedin no longer have a protector. They have nowhere to go and a sovereign Iraq wants them out. We may have offered some sort of exchange: protection, safe passage (perhaps) in return for everything they know.

I doubt the military tells Reuters anything they don't want published and spun.
2 posted on 07/26/2004 2:17:30 PM PDT by reformedliberal (Proud Bush-Cheney04 volunteer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal

"The group denies any such ambition."


3 posted on 07/26/2004 2:23:32 PM PDT by Fyscat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

I was about to say that myself. These people are communist filth. Let's get real here.


4 posted on 07/26/2004 6:52:40 PM PDT by French-American Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
I seem to remember a truce with these guys during the invasion and I think they may have been somewhat useful in stopping some Iranians from comming across the border.I don't see any reason for not arming these guys to the teeth and quietly sending them back to Iran.
5 posted on 07/26/2004 7:38:38 PM PDT by edchambers (Where are we going and why am I in this hand-basket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson