Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BayStar sets lawyers on SCO
The Register (online) ^ | Monday 26th July 2004 11:35 GMT | Lucy Sherriff

Posted on 07/26/2004 10:16:56 AM PDT by NJ_gent

SCO's attempts to rescue its relationship with BayStar Capital, its biggest backer, have come to naught. On Friday morning, Eastern time, SCO announced that the stock buyback deal it agreed with the unhappy investment firm had closed. Two hours and five minutes later, Baystar issued a statement saying that a) no it hadn't and b) we'll see you in court, matey.

BayStar is the sole remaining major investor in SCO. Last year, it invested $20m in Series A stock, and then picked up another $20m worth of stock offloaded by the Royal Bank of Canada. In April, it told SCO it wanted its investment back because, it alleged, SCO had not kept to the terms of the investment agreement. The two companies agreed a stock buy back deal that would have seen SCO pay 2.1 million shares and $13m in cash to BayStar.

continued...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: baystar; linux; sco
First attempt at posting, so apologies if anything's broken/incorrect. Excerpted to be on the safe side.

Things are certainly not looking good for SCO, nor for SCO's customers. (Yes, they still have some)

1 posted on 07/26/2004 10:16:58 AM PDT by NJ_gent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NJ_gent

Burn, baby, burn!


2 posted on 07/26/2004 10:18:13 AM PDT by ECM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ECM

I expect to see a perp walk for the SCO heads sometime in the next six months.


3 posted on 07/26/2004 10:20:27 AM PDT by flashbunny (Help prevent stupidity. Please remember to spay and neuter your celebrities. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

It does my heart good to see this scam unravel.


4 posted on 07/26/2004 10:37:24 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NJ_gent

Groklaw was all over the BayStar news as it happened
on friday.

http://www.groklaw.net/

Check both topical threads for the most advanced
speculation on what BayStar is up to (it's not like
there's any chance they'll actually get their
money back).

SCO also got clobbered in court last week vs.
Daimler-Chrysler.

And the GPL was upheld by a German court.

Busy week for SCO and open source.


5 posted on 07/26/2004 10:37:35 AM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NJ_gent
My take is that the Chrysler judgment last week bodes real bad for SCO. They lost in all points except for a small item that does not have anything to do with the IP rights. Look for the AutoZone suit to follow since the judge was waiting to hear from this court. BayStar probably saw the writing on the wall and that the stock would be worthless and now wants out of the deal. I would look for them to obtain IP rights over the code in a judgment. The IP is only value that this company has left and that is fading fast. I would like to know how much cash on hand SCO has. They must be burning a lot of cash in these law suits. Just my two bits for what ever it's worth.
6 posted on 07/26/2004 10:58:50 AM PDT by reagandemo (The battle is near are you ready for the sacrifice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagandemo
I would look for [BayStar] to obtain IP rights over the code in a judgment.

That's assuming that SCO has the rights to begin with.. and that's still in dispute.

7 posted on 07/26/2004 5:29:12 PM PDT by TechJunkYard (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reagandemo

That also assumes SCO actually has any IP left after IBM's lawyers are done with them.

After SCO loses its claims there are countersuits to be delt with. The only assets anybody expects will be there is the IP (such as it is).


8 posted on 07/26/2004 5:33:06 PM PDT by Dinsdale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TechJunkYard; ShadowAce; shadowman99; rdb3
This looks to be winding down in a hurry....

The lawyers are going to be fighting each other as they feast on the carcass!

9 posted on 07/26/2004 10:09:34 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All
I missed the Friday action, maybe others have also, so I'll just drop this in here:

_________________________________________________________________

Press Release

Source: BayStar Capital

Baystar Capital Announces Repurchase Transaction With the SCO Group, Inc. Has Not Closed
Friday July 23, 1:56 pm ET

SAN FRANCISCO, July 23 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- BayStar Capital today announced that, despite a prior announcement by The SCO Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: SCOX - News) to the contrary, the transactions contemplated by the Stock Repurchase Agreement by and between BayStar and SCO, dated as of May 31, 2004, have not closed due to an unresolved dispute between the parties. BayStar intends to file an action requesting a declaratory judgment with respect to its rights under the Stock Repurchase Agreement. Until a final determination is made by the court, BayStar maintains its position as a Series A-1 Preferred stockholder of SCO.



Source: BayStar Capital

10 posted on 07/26/2004 10:15:05 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All
From the Register ....this is a hoot...SCO maintains that it has been a paragon of virtue and transparency"

____________________________________________

According to SCO, at the root of the disagreement are BayStar's claims that there are inconsistencies between public and private statements made by the software company. BayStar wants SCO to provide documentary evidence to support its recent public claims about the SCOsource business.

SCO maintains that it has been a paragon of virtue and transparency throughout, and that everything it said publicly and privately is true. But, and this should come as no surprise, it won't hand over the documents BayStar wants to see. It says this is to "protect the confidential and proprietary nature of the information" and to "avoid fostering speculation regarding its SCOsource business".

SCO's stock fell slightly on the news, ending the day at $4.20.

11 posted on 07/26/2004 10:19:38 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TechJunkYard
I agree. From what I have read it looks like there was some very sloppy legal work on the agreement between Novel and SCO at least on Cauldera (SCO's) part. Would it not be a big laugh if SCO ended up holding an empty bag. The only people who end up winners on this are Microsoft (minimally) and the lawyers big time. Any event a whole lot of money wasted by a bunch of companies and people protecting themselves.
12 posted on 07/27/2004 5:34:42 AM PDT by reagandemo (The battle is near are you ready for the sacrifice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson