So what about the children? They're the ones who suffer if we end child support.
Or more likely --- it's the taxpayer who suffers. Let the child's own father support him --- others who had nothing to do with the conception should not have to pay.
"The children" will be much better off when women stop having unwed babies left and right knowing they can get a blank check from some emotional-based feminized code of laws.
Two, this bears repeating - TWO - parents are necessary for a child. No amount of money for shopping sprees from some judge will replace one.
If some lady wants to be single, get a sperm donor, and raise a child on her own, thats her perogative, she can be the example to the rest.
And i agree with RightOnline. "for the children" is a line that does not belong on free republic. That line has been used to many times to legitimize ignorant legislation and quell logical thinking!