Posted on 07/24/2004 11:41:29 AM PDT by RussianConservative
MINSK - Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko said on Tuesday that Russia was funding opposition groups in Belarus. At the same time, he noted that it was not the Russian President and the Russian government who were supporting the opposition.
When they bring 180,000 (dollars) from Moscow, half for Marinich and half for Frolov In my place, would not you be worried that the opposition is funded by Russia, my Russia, brotherly Russia? Mr. Lukashenko was quoted as saying by the Vremya Novostey newspaper.
According to the Belarusian leader, this is wasted money, vain efforts. He promised to disclose the sources of funding of his opponents in the upcoming presidential race. They take money, and later they work it off, and they do it badly. They also steal it, as it happened during the last presidential election campaign, Mr. Lukashenko stressed.
Mikhail Marinich is the former Economy Minister of Belarus and a candidate for President in the 2001 elections. Last spring, he was arrested on suspicion of illegal weapons possession. Valery Frolov is a member of parliament. In June, he went on hunger strike demanding to liberalize election laws.
Belarus is a cesspool in Eastern Europe....
I have several Belarussians who work for me who refuse to ever go back but to visit relatives....
Outside of Minsk, services and living conditions are truly third world.
Larschenko is a dictator suppressing the people, free press and elections and longs for the day that communism returns....
NeverGore :^)
It is sad to watch what this guy doing in this country, peoples of Belarus will pay high price for his bandit policy even long time after they eliminate him. I heard that on Thursday Lukashenko said that Belarus is land of milk and honey and European economical tiger, he said that after this massive demonstrations. I read today that he close Belarusian section of Russian TV, cause in his opinion they support opposition (here probably he has right), they said that in Minsk were 4000 peoples and official Belarusian information was that only 200. After that gas affair this case maybe next conflict with Russia.
"Belarus is land of milk and honey and European economical tiger"
I heard it. Some times ago it could be even funny, but now it is danger.
Belaruss is future 4 more oblasts of Russia...better for everyone but Luki.
Well, personally I want Belarus in EU, of course when they at last put Luki to prison and will be normal democratic country. As I know 50% of their society want back to Russia and other half want independent Belarus in EU, especially younger part of them dont want anything to do with Russia, they growing up in independent country. (In fact only Luki is independent guy) But slowly first Ukraine, my Poland must continue our support to their ambitions, and convince the Germans and the French that this is not a dream but reality. As more countries in EU as less they have to say and this is good for us.
Yes he is more and more impertinent.
We will see how Poland feels soon, say in year or two, how cost of living will skyrocket, just like in Ireland, Spain, Portugal, Greece, while salaries stay equal to before.
And majority of Belaruss want unification. Further Belaruss exist only because Russia, until now, is paying for Belaruss oil and gas.
Poland will submerge as second tier member of EU and no, your say will be small and French-German-Belgium say will now govern your lives. The main reason they want Eastern Europe is to stop future competition from rising to EU...by smothering your companies and factories. Already Czeck lost major bottling factory when German company move it from Sudatenland to Nizhni Novograd...this will excellerate in the future. Russia grows, EU elites grow, the rest of you EUers will smother under your better's rule.
Economic Outlook
The EU economy is expected to have grown by less than one per cent in 2003, a further weakening from the modest growth of 1.1 per cent in 2002. Domestic demand fell as the poor domestic and international economic climate led businesses to defer investment spending. Private consumption suffered from an increase in unemployment, low consumer confidence and consumers' concerns about the international security environment. Weak external demand for EU goods and services and the appreciation of the euro lowered EU exports, which had been the driver of growth in 2002. Policy settings are relatively loose: budget deficits have risen, including in France and Germany where deficits have exceeded for the third consecutive year the three per cent budget deficit ceiling enshrined in the euro area's Stability and Growth Pact. France and Germany have successfully lobbied other Member States to avoid incurring financial penalties for these deficit breaches. However, these deficit breaches without incurring penalties have caused concern among both authorities and private market analysts about the damage to Economic and Monetary Union's credibility, including the euro. Euro area official interest rates have progressively fallen since early-2001 to stimulate domestic demand.
The EU, particularly northern Member States, has achieved productivity improvements as part of its ambitious Lisbon Goal of becoming the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy economy in the world by 2010 - but much remains to be done. The EU plans to increase competition in energy, transport, postal and financial services sectors. Substantial reform of product and labour markets will be required to achieve a lift in productivity required to meet the Lisbon Goal. The EU's Growth Initiative aims to lift the EU's economic growth rate by increasing investment in innovation, research and development, and developing modern and efficient transport infrastructure. The unemployment rate in the EU has averaged just under nine per cent during 2003 and is forecast to remain at that level during 2004. EU inflation averaged 2.1 per cent in 2003 and is expected to fall slightly in 2004.
Outlook
Consensus Economics (November 2003) forecasts EU economic growth to increase to 2.0 per cent in 2004. The pace of the US' economic recovery is expected to be the determining factor on the strength of the EU's recovery. EU business investment is forecast to strengthen in 2004 as the profit outlook improves. Fiscal policy is expected to tighten, particularly in France and Germany. The European Central Bank (ECB) will monitor the strength of the euro area's recovery in 2004 closely with an eye for the appropriate setting of official interest rates, bearing in mind that euro area inflation is at the ECB's target ceiling.
Enlargement of the EU to take in ten countries of Central and Eastern Europe is scheduled to take place in May 2004. These countries have made impressive strides in economic development to prepare for accession to the EU, but nonetheless remain noticeably behind existing EU members in aspects of institutional infrastructure. These countries' accession could have a deflationary impact on existing EU members, resulting from unrestricted market access to accession countries' cheaper goods and services

Here is some interesting facts I also find:
Farmers are protesting in Central Europe after a proposal for agricultural aid was published in Brussels. Some prospective members now are afraid of the effects that joining of the union might bring. The EU has a common agricultural policy (CAP) that injects money into farms in the form of directed payments. The problem is that the EU has proposed to give only 25% of this ?money injection? to the farmers in Central Europe. Only after a period of ten years of membership in the EU will the countries finally get the 100% of the aid that the EU gives to the farms in the rest of the EU. The fear that farmers from Poland have is that the amount of money they will get from the EU will not be even close to the amounts current members of the EU get, making competition unfair. They feel that, because this unbalanced competition, their farms will be driven into bankruptcy and they will have no way to recover; in ten years, they argue, their farms will be gone.
This is freedom and capitalism?
Another fear that these farmers stems from another common law of the EU: the institution of production quotas. The EU sets quotas over the production of dairy farms, creating different production standards in different countries. In the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovenia and Poland, these quotas are far below the quotas their governments have set in past years. Therefore, farmers in these countries fear that the quotas set by the EU might slow their production significantly.
As an American my only concern is about how America interacts with Russia and etc. This is an internal problem and I am happy to leave it to the citizens of these two respective nations. As an American I want to adhere to teh policy of mind my own business and you mind yours.
Destro, I share your views!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.