Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RadioAstronomer

Well you know, bottom line, if you want to find intelligent life on Mars, put men up there! We put 12 men on the moon over a quarter of a century ago. Were would we be, in your opinion, if we had kept up that rate of exploration?


41 posted on 08/17/2004 9:12:02 PM PDT by TomasUSMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: TomasUSMC
Were would we be, in your opinion, if we had kept up that rate of exploration?

Well, I am not sure on this one. There were several directions we could have taken. One was the logical conclusion to the X-15 being an SSTO (Single Stage to Orbit) vehicle, or possibly a more defined presence in Earth's orbit. Would we have a greater presence on the Moon if we had continued? I am not sure.

Apollo was "pushed" to its very limits as a transport vehicle. I wish 18 and 19 flew, however, for a long term “residence” a different (heavy lifting) spacecraft would have been required. A Mission to Mars is such a huge endeavor compared to the Moon that I believe it would still be in the wings even if the space program had not been cut back. Earth orbit and lunar resources should be the priority for the moment.

42 posted on 08/18/2004 8:51:56 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson